ps.**com[mailto:
>> rbw-owners-bunch@**googlegroups.com ]
>> *On Behalf Of *Peter Morgano
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:33 PM
>> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.**com
>> *Subject:* Re: [RBW] Cute Riv ad on BSNYC
>>
>> Since it being used by a business
---
> *From:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Morgano
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:33 PM
> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [RBW] Cute Riv ad on BSNYC
>
> Since it being used
2:33 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Cute Riv ad on BSNYC
Since it being used by a business to sell products towards a profit it doenst
fall under parody or public use. Of course there are a fair bit of these
circumstances and the legal depts of these companies choose
Since it being used by a business to sell products towards a profit it
doenst fall under parody or public use. Of course there are a fair bit of
these circumstances and the legal depts of these companies choose just to
ingore it since it is somewhat a case of free adverstising and if done
tastefull
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:23 -0400, Peter Morgano wrote:
> As someone who works in the legal field I couldnt help but wonder the
> same thing as well. Hopefully this is below the radar of their
> copyright enforcement division.
If it's a joke, doesn't that constitute fair use?
>
> On Tue, May
As someone who works in the legal field I couldnt help but wonder the same
thing as well. Hopefully this is below the radar of their copyright
enforcement division.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Allingham II, Thomas J <
thomas.alling...@skadden.com> wrote:
> **
> Wonder whether that jewelry es
Wonder whether that jewelry establishment on 5th Ave cleared use of the blue
box, or Riv is going rogue?
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PATRICK MOORE
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:14 AM
To: rbw-own
