inum polishes up nicely, but it does rub off on the bags, so
you might want to wrap it in tape.
Cheers
Steve
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:41:12 -0800
> Subject: [RBW] Re: lightest rear rack
> From: charles_v...@hotmail.com
> To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
>
> That sound
Why do you need the rack?
Consider the following, that doesn't need a rack:
Medium Sackville Saddle-sack:
http://www.rivbike.com/products/list/bags_and_racks?a=1&page=all#product=20-132
Saddlebag Grip (Nitto):
http://www.rivbike.com/products/list/bags_and_racks?a=1&page=all#product=20-109
This w
tal cost about $25 and 45 minutes
> with a file and drill. Weight is somewhere around 200 grams.
>
> Don't have any pictures of this, but hope the above description makes sense.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stevy
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:57 -0800
> > S
And +1 for the Bagman. I recently installed one on my mountain bike, to keep
the Nelson off the tire. Much better than the VO seatpost clamp support.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Mark wrote:
>
>
> +1 on the saddlebag. A Carradice Barley needs no rear rack on all but
> the smallest of bikes a
+1 on the saddlebag. A Carradice Barley needs no rear rack on all but
the smallest of bikes and you can use
a Bagman for a larger bag like a Nelson Longflap or Camper.
Here is a link to my setup. I'm carrying everything for an extended
tour and the only rack on the bike is an Expedition Bagman.
I have the Tubus Fly on my Pedersen, I also have the Berthoud gb799
small panniers
Here are a couple of pix.
http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr77/surfn54/Pedersen%20Bicycle/PEDERSEN040-1.jpg
http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr77/surfn54/Pedersen%20Bicycle/PEDERSEN042-1.jpg
I highly recomme
9:54:57 -0800
> Subject: [RBW] Re: lightest rear rack
> From: charles_v...@hotmail.com
> To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
>
> I plan on building my own lightweight commuter racks for use with
> special home made thin panniers and as a bag support...the front
> one will be
Wow that Berthoud setup looks like something you'd see on a bike
belonging to Hercule Poirot, sitting in front of a 5-star hotel.
On Nov 21, 1:07 pm, Garth wrote:
> If you want to avoid your legs from hitting the bags of typical
> saddlebag set-ups, look at
> this.http://www.wallbike.com/berth
No "laundered money" doesn't work here. Wish it did. Maybe just
clean cash?
Have used the R-14 and really is nice with a rack bag. But no, maybe
not the thing for a high crime area. Maybe the VO Constructeur
rack?
Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN
On Nov 21, 3:13�pm, Steve Palincsar wrote:
> I accide
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:30 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
> On 11/20/09, jim_OLP wrote:
> > I do have a saddlebag, but it's too small in the winter and it's
> > canvas, I don't want to soak it.
>
> ??? They are (at least the Carradices are) built to take it. I've
> carried water in my Nelson with n
About 24x13cm platform.
Rack alone weighs 320g, 440g with the bag-o-hardware that came with it.
Ryan
On Nov 21, 2009, at 11:53 AM, jim_OLP wrote:
> That's sort of what I was looking for, although it looks short front-
> to-back. Apparently Vetta no longer makes them?
>
>>
>> How about this Vett
If you want to avoid your legs from hitting the bags of typical
saddlebag set-ups, look at this.
http://www.wallbike.com/berthoud/saddlebagrack.html
It's no lightweight champ,but what's not to like?
I see Lon Haldeman uses these on his Bike Friday Bike .
http://community.bikefriday.com/sites/de
That's sort of what I was looking for, although it looks short front-
to-back. Apparently Vetta no longer makes them?
>
> How about this Vetta Rack?
> Aluminum and pretty light.http://www.flickr.com/photos/7556...@n06/4121848193/
> Top struts mount to the usual rear rack mounting spots. The lower
>
> On Nov 20, 5:15 pm, jim_OLP wrote:
>> Most people seem to be looking for the strongest rear rack they can
>> find. They're carrying engine blocks down pothole-lined streets, or
>> crossing Mongolia solo. I want the opposite - the lightest, least
>> obtrusive rack there is. The rack for minim
I plan on building my own lightweight commuter racks for use with
special home made thin panniers and as a bag support...the front
one will be for mounting lights and a small bag for tools, wallet.
etc. I want to use stainless tubing but may just use light gauge
chrome moly and powdercoat to ma
Moots - yest that setup looks neat. And the R14 is probably worth the
money. Thanks for the tips.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from thi
On 11/20/09, jim_OLP wrote:
> I do have a saddlebag, but it's too small in the winter and it's
> canvas, I don't want to soak it.
??? They are (at least the Carradices are) built to take it. I've
carried water in my Nelson with nary a leak -- really. And a Camper is
pretty big.
I already have
You can get a mini rack that hangs off the saddle or the seatpost to support a
medium or small saddle bag. Jim D. Massachusetts
--- On Fri, 11/20/09, JoelMatthews wrote:
From: JoelMatthews
Subject: [RBW] Re: lightest rear rack
To: "RBW Owners Bunch"
Da
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 20:23 -0700, rswat...@me.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 19:58, jim_OLP wrote:
>
> > The old MAFAC rack does look interesting if it could somehow merge
> > with cantilever brakes.
>
> It can! I've seen it done.
> Someone took just the center mount piece off a MAFA
Moots
Tailgator Rack and Bag
A must for any rider seeking a lightweight performance rack pack.
With 400 cubic inches and carrying capacity of 5 lbs, this carrying
system provides ample room to store all your essentials.
Two shims are included to fit a range of seatpost diameters.
The custom made t
Moots
http://aebike.com/product/moots-tailgator-ti-rear-rack-w-bag-sku-rk1820-qc30.htm
On Nov 20, 8:38 pm, Bill Connell wrote:
> I'd also recommend a large saddlebag, but if you're looking
> specifically for a lightweight rack and don't want to spend $100, get
> the Pletscher. Aluminum, light,
I'd also recommend a large saddlebag, but if you're looking
specifically for a lightweight rack and don't want to spend $100, get
the Pletscher. Aluminum, light, carries enough. Why not?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, jim_OLP wrote:
> I do have a saddlebag, but it's too small in the winter and
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:52 PM, jim_OLP wrote:
>
> Tubus "fly": also very expensive.
>
>
Well I was going to point out the Tubus Airy, but I guess you wouldn't like
that either. Looks like a great rack, though!! I have the Luna, and I think
it's great. A little narrow for a trunk bag, but I use
On Nov 20, 2009, at 19:58, jim_OLP wrote:
> The old MAFAC rack does look interesting if it could somehow merge
> with cantilever brakes.
It can! I've seen it done.
Someone took just the center mount piece off a MAFAC Racer brake,
bolted the little rack to the two bare studs, then bolted th
The old MAFAC rack does look interesting if it could somehow merge
with cantilever brakes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group
I do have a saddlebag, but it's too small in the winter and it's
canvas, I don't want to soak it. I already have a nylon 'trunk' bag
which is perfectly sized, but I don't need the support of the big
rack.
Nitro R14: too nice, too expensive, a target for thieves. I sometimes
park in dodgy spots.
R14 - Nitto is beautiful, but $105 makes it a target for thieves. And
they don't even have a photo showing the entire rack, I couldn't see
how it's actually mounted, I assume those rods go down to the
dropouts...
On Nov 20, 7:30 pm, eflayer wrote:
> do you hate the looks of the Nitto R14. I c
+1 on the saddlebag. A Carradice Barley needs no rear rack on all but
the smallest of bikes and you can use
a Bagman for a larger bag like a Nelson Longflap or Camper.
Here is a link to my setup. I'm carrying everything for an extended
tour and the only rack on the bike is an Expedition Bagman.
h
Just get a small saddle bag then. The least obtrusive is nothing,
right?
On Nov 20, 7:15 pm, jim_OLP wrote:
> Most people seem to be looking for the strongest rear rack they can
> find. They're carrying engine blocks down pothole-lined streets, or
> crossing Mongolia solo. I want the opposite -
Jim:
First of all, beware the slippery slope you are about to descend.
Once you've put a rack on one bike, you'll never be able to turn
back. Racks and luggage are addictive, and there's no 12 step program
to get you off them.
If you're as minimalist as you say, look at adapting Mark's rack (fro
do you hate the looks of the Nitto R14. I can understand not being
fond of the price, but what's not to like about the looks. Think it's
petty light too. A little heavier I guess, but not near the bucks,
would be the Pletscher rack at Riv. That one mounts front or rear and
looks damn good enoug
31 matches
Mail list logo
