I replied to your email. Yes I am wanting it.
Kelly
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/Zj2KfB4CZMQJ.
To post to this group, send emai
Hi Kelly,
Well, I'm about to do the "unk-thinkable" and put my 68cm Quickbeam up
for grabs. Let me know if you're interested.
Thanks,
al
On Jun 27, 10:56 pm, Kelly Sleeper wrote:
> Ok so I'm not holding my breath... But am looking just the same.. You know
> you want to sell it.
> I mean come on
the Hugey Fuji probably qualifies as 'hunchy'. I think it's more like a
58cm c-t-c on the level top tube, but I'll measure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.c
What's the top tube length on that?
Some very tall frames from that era are not so long. I have a
Centurion from about 1983 in my rafters that I remember as being a
62/56. I called it a hunchy frame.
On Jun 28, 3:00 pm, William wrote:
> One of you tall dudes can have the thrill of having a commut
One of you tall dudes can have the thrill of having a commuter bike that's
too big for you, for SUPER cheap! I have this 27" frame Fuji leftover from
the bike swap I helped run as a fundraiser for my kids' elementary school.
$80 + shipping! Lugs! Steel! Two chainrings like a QB! A choice o
Seconds on the next quickbeam after Kelly snatches one up. When one
finally becomes available maybe another will follow.
Ryan
6'7" 230 lbs 99cm PBH
On Jun 27, 10:56 pm, Kelly Sleeper wrote:
> Ok so I'm not holding my breath... But am looking just the same.. You know
> you want to sell it.
> I
