Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-12 Thread Kelly Sleeper
Im 6'5" and bought a 67cm AHH .rides great and I'm happy..however when I was in walnut creek I borrowed a 71cm and it was fine. Great rise and fit but less seatpost and stem. I kinda wish I had am 66cm Bombadil (not made just saying) instead of the 64. Talk to riv ... I'm a fan of going bi

Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread erik jensen
apologies for spamming the list! On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:40 PM, erik jensen wrote: > Hi Anne, > > I was hoping for 1600, it has some nice low low mileage bits and has been > recently repainted. We're nearby too, I'm just up in Oakland. A good strong > bicycle, I will miss it. > > Here's a desc

Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread erik jensen
Hi Anne, I was hoping for 1600, it has some nice low low mileage bits and has been recently repainted. We're nearby too, I'm just up in Oakland. A good strong bicycle, I will miss it. Here's a description I sent earlier today: "I have a beautiful 64cm rambouillet, purchased off the list as a fram

Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread Anne Paulson
Is it still for sale? How much do you want for it? On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:00 PM, erik jensen wrote: > Hey Anne, > I'm 6'4" and ride either a 64 or 66cm. My 64cm ram fit me perfect and I just > put it up for sale--know that's not precisely what you're asking for but > just fyi. > cheers, > e >

Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread erik jensen
Hey Anne, I'm 6'4" and ride either a 64 or 66cm. My 64cm ram fit me perfect and I just put it up for sale--know that's not precisely what you're asking for but just fyi. cheers, e On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Jim wrote: > Well, there is that, for sure! :-) > > Jim > > On Nov 10, 1:30 pm,

[RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread Jim
Well, there is that, for sure! :-) Jim On Nov 10, 1:30 pm, Anne Paulson wrote: > Yeah, but Rivendell bikes are prettier. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jim wrote: > > Didn't i read somewhere that Surly was doing a 64cm LHT? > > > Jim Fekete > > Boulder, CO > > > On Nov 1

[RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread Garth
The 64cm. Surly is not going to allow nearly as high bars either, and no higher than their 62. They use the same fork steerer length! kind of Homer Simpson DUH! .. on that one lol. The TT is a full inch shorter too than a 62cm Hunq. Plus yeah it's a Rivendell and rides like

Re: [RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread Anne Paulson
Yeah, but Rivendell bikes are prettier. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jim wrote: > Didn't i read somewhere that Surly was doing a 64cm LHT? > > Jim Fekete > Boulder, CO > > On Nov 10, 11:30 am, Anne Paulson wrote: >> Looking for a do-everything bike for my 6'4" son, who is ridiculously >> cr

[RBW] Re: WTB: 64 cm Sam or 62 cm Hunqa

2011-11-10 Thread Jim
Didn't i read somewhere that Surly was doing a 64cm LHT? Jim Fekete Boulder, CO On Nov 10, 11:30 am, Anne Paulson wrote: > Looking for a do-everything bike for my 6'4" son, who is ridiculously > cramped on his too-small Surly LHT. If you have one for sale, email me > and we'll talk. > > -- > --