I have a photo of me standing next to the 48cm, but unfortunately, not
riding it. It is definitely a small frame and, aside from the
upsloping top-tube and stingy standover clearance, almost exactly the
same size as my new custom all-around frame which was designed to
replace my 48cm B'stone XO-2.
Awesome. That means it would be about the right size for me. Hunqa
is back on the table!
On May 3, 6:15 pm, Ginz wrote:
> Sorry, I meant that with my 76cm PBH, the 48cm Hunqa was as large a
> frame as I'd consider. The top tube length was fine but I had zero
> standover. I did not ask for an
Sorry, I meant that with my 76cm PBH, the 48cm Hunqa was as large a
frame as I'd consider. The top tube length was fine but I had zero
standover. I did not ask for an "official" recommendation but I
suspect they'd steer me
toward the 47cm Atlantis, instead. For the money and greater trail-
abilit
You're 5'4" and felt that the 48 was too small? By Grants description
you should buy down and since I usually run a 54/53 size a 48 Hunq
would be my size (I assume). But I am 5'9". I am sure the 54 would
be too tall.
This may be swaying me towards the SH.
On May 2, 6:06 pm, Ginz wrote:
> Hell
