[RBW] Re: Spurious Posts

2009-09-07 Thread R Gonet
Ditto. On Sep 8, 12:09 am, RoadieRyan wrote: > Amen -what Patrick said  THANKS! > > On Sep 7, 2:30 pm, PATRICK MOORE wrote: > > > > > Jim -- not to the subject, but thanks for your work in maintaining this > > entertaining list. > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, CycloFiend wrote: > > > > o

[RBW] Re: Spurious Posts

2009-09-07 Thread RoadieRyan
Amen -what Patrick said THANKS! On Sep 7, 2:30 pm, PATRICK MOORE wrote: > Jim -- not to the subject, but thanks for your work in maintaining this > entertaining list. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, CycloFiend wrote: > > > on 9/7/09 2:16 PM, CycloFiend at cyclofi...@earthlink.net w

[RBW] Re: Spurious Posts

2009-09-07 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Jim -- not to the subject, but thanks for your work in maintaining this entertaining list. On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, CycloFiend wrote: > > on 9/7/09 2:16 PM, CycloFiend at cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote: > > My typing-fu is weak today: > > The most recent spam post didn't come across my in

[RBW] Re: Spurious Posts

2009-09-07 Thread CycloFiend
on 9/7/09 2:16 PM, CycloFiend at cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote: My typing-fu is weak today: > The most recent spam post didn't come across my inbox, and actually doesn't > seem to only appear when the list is viewed through the online version. The > only reason I caught it was from the ensuing