Thanks!
They are tiny USB lights(front and back), I ordered from Blue Lug in
Japan. Also running a PB SuperFlash in the rear.
The light output is not exceptional.Two settings, on/flash. Good to "be
seen" in the city and not blind the other folks in the bike lane, but if
you need to ride where the
first riv! that's a nice set of wheels, ben, dang. the quickbeam orange
is just the perfect hue of orange. are those reflectors or lights you've
got on the back?
paul
takoma park, md.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
Ben, nicely done. Welcome to the group and thank you for posting the pics.
I agree with Rob - please us your QB with the bag. Thanks!
Best,
Rich in ATL
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-5, Cody Bartz wrote:
>
> Great idea, thank you for sharing. I have a bag I may do the same.
>
>
Great idea, thank you for sharing. I have a bag I may do the same.
: )
Cody
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@go
Thank you to all. Perfect
On Jul 31, 6:17 pm, EricP wrote:
> I'm assuming she doesn't like either the grey grid or the olive?
> Happen to think the olive looks nice, but that's me.
>
> An option could be the Arkel Tail Rider. Available in red. Not
> necessarily as handsome, but would do the job
I'm assuming she doesn't like either the grey grid or the olive?
Happen to think the olive looks nice, but that's me.
An option could be the Arkel Tail Rider. Available in red. Not
necessarily as handsome, but would do the job.
Tweed might eventually make it's way, but when I asked, was told th
How about these?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31353...@n07/3395869360/in/set-72157616085693460/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:05 PM, scott wrote:
> They may be doing a trunksack in the tweed. But if'n she is in a
> hurry, you may be out of luck. Maybe stap a wald backet to the back
> and never
They may be doing a trunksack in the tweed. But if'n she is in a
hurry, you may be out of luck. Maybe stap a wald backet to the back
and never worry about which bag to use.
Scott
On Jul 30, 2:13 pm, stormlight wrote:
> My wife loves the design of the Sackville TrunkSack. Its just what she
> ne
BTW, you can spin it around and mount that style seat bag on the handlebars.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:34 AM, amoll68 wrote:
> Thanks Ryan. I also think it's a looker - and was inspired by other
> bikes I've seen here, Flickr, and Cyclofiend (I do intend to send
> pictures there, too.)
>
> I fi
Thanks Ryan. I also think it's a looker - and was inspired by other
bikes I've seen here, Flickr, and Cyclofiend (I do intend to send
pictures there, too.)
I figured the bulldog mini would fit up front, but was pleasantly
surprised that it fit so well in the seat bag. I had previously tried
to get
I realize this is a thread about bags but DAMN what a sweet looking
homer. Nice Ride Axel. Back on topic I have a Lil Loafer mounted up
front and it handles the bulldog mini lock just fine
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryans_rando/3741240547/in/set-72157621755729272
Ryan
West Seattle
On Jan 11,
I don't think that it is necessarily an "either/or" thing. You can
select the bag needed for a particular purpose on any given day.
Anyone who is in to photography "gets it". The photographer has a
slew of bags suited to any purpose. A large shoulder bag that can
accommodate two camera bodies, 3
I have a small Berthoud (GB 22)on my Kogswell. It was not selected
based on headtube size since I gave up ease-of-removal. I attached it
to my rack with P clamps. In other words, it stays on the bike almost
all the time. I understand this will only be a solution for a few.
On Jan 11, 8:01 am,
.
Glenn
Mount Joy, Pa.
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Lynn Skean"
To: "RBW Owners Bunch"
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 10:32 AM
Subject: [RBW] Re: Sackville TrunkSack
>
> I wonder what this implies about the Sackville-style Li'l Loafer tha
Rain? What exactly is that again?
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Ron Farnsworth wrote:
> Have you considered the zipper cover and the implications of rain?
>
> --- On *Fri, 4/3/09, David Estes * wrote:
>
> From: David Estes
> Subject: [RBW] Re: Sackville TrunkSack
>
Have you considered the zipper cover and the implications of rain?
--- On Fri, 4/3/09, David Estes wrote:
From: David Estes
Subject: [RBW] Re: Sackville TrunkSack
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 10:55 PM
I'm glad to see the smaller one opening towar
I wonder what this implies about the Sackville-style Li'l Loafer that
appeared in one of the photos promoting a SaddleSack. Will they go
forward with that?
I have a basket in front on a rack and I love my large SaddleSack;
thus won't be getting a rack trunk for either front or rear. But I do
like
I'm glad to see the smaller one opening toward the rider. That's what's
kept me away from buying a Li'l Loafer so far.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, CycloFiend wrote:
>
> on 4/3/09 2:10 PM, Marty at mgie...@mac.com wrote:
>
> > Two new rack-top models - large and small - to add to the Sackvil
on 4/3/09 2:10 PM, Marty at mgie...@mac.com wrote:
> Two new rack-top models - large and small - to add to the Sackville
> line. Just a wee bit more than your average loafers.
>
> http://www.rivbike.com/products/list/bags_and_racks#product=20-135
Nice! Maybe now I can retire my aging, cracking
19 matches
Mail list logo
