Re: [RBW] Re: Photos: 64cm Waterford built Hillborne

2010-11-15 Thread robert zeidler
It's mine!!! Can't wait to get out for a spin. My Riv Custom is closer to a 68cm but this should be a good fit! On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bryan @ Renaissance Bicycles < renaissancebicyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > @ Andrew, > Yes, the is the Sugino Alpina Triple. Looks good and works very >

[RBW] Re: Photos: 64cm Waterford built Hillborne

2010-11-13 Thread Bryan @ Renaissance Bicycles
@ Andrew, Yes, the is the Sugino Alpina Triple. Looks good and works very well. I never felt the Sugino 500T was in any way "sloppy" when shifting, but the Alpina is definitely better. Of course, is about $80 more. @ kuma, I think you get whatever fork they give you ... and you're happy with it

[RBW] Re: Photos: 64cm Waterford built Hillborne

2010-11-12 Thread kuma
I also thought the three dot forks were the canti forks, and the no dot forks were the sidepull forks? There are so many different versions of the Sam fork, it is hard to keep track of them, and it's not at all clear to me which one you will get if you order a Sam. On Nov 12, 7:49 am, "Bryan @ Re

[RBW] Re: Photos: 64cm Waterford built Hillborne

2010-11-12 Thread Andrew
Is that an Alpina Triple? Never seen one, real pretty. On Nov 12, 6:49 am, "Bryan @ Renaissance Bicycles" wrote: > It is safe to say that this is the largest bike we've had in the Shop > for a while; a 64cm double toptube Hillborne: > > http://www.renaissancebicycles.com/gallery/rb-gallery-1/ > >