Ryan writes: Although the SF location has a growing lead very few
pollsters (only 3 of 60) currently listed a willingness to attend
either great state.
I say: in my opinion, this is a mistaken interpretation of the
results. I voted for China Camp. That doesn't mean I wouldn't go to
Minneapolis. It
Since it is the 20th Anniversary of Rivendell why not celebrate with both
locations since separate dates are already being proposed. Although the SF
location has a growing lead very few pollsters (only 3 of 60) currently listed
a willingness to attend either great state. Conflicts due to proxi
My wife, a San Marcos rider would be joining me, but only in MSP. We can't do
SF. Another lady who's not on the list, but would be present. :)
I agree about doing a run off of locations without splitting the vote between
dates.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
I'd really like to go...to either location. But I wouldn't be able to
commit until I see how my 2014 travel shakes out.
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:01:16 PM UTC-6, Anne Paulson wrote:
>
> The poll is depressing me. Not the closeness of the vote; that's fine,
> I voted for SF Bay but either
I think we should have a poll based strictly on location. A vote is a
vote, if somebody votes for both count both, obviously that person feels
they can come no matter what and that fact is important also. When we
settle on a location, we can concentrate on dates, rides lodging etc.
Marc
On F
I can think of 3-4 great rides using China Camp as a start-end point and
covering a few different types of ride:
1. A mellow ride around the Paradise Loop rollers. Only one medium-size
hill along the way. So, a climb out and a climb back in. I would figure the
basic loop would be ~25 miles(???), b
Of course we should have crazy rides for people who want crazy rides.
Point is, we should also mellow rides for people who want mellow
rides.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Manuel Acosta
wrote:
> Great thing about these big events is that it gives folks options.
> I don't mind trying to figure
Great thing about these big events is that it gives folks options.
I don't mind trying to figure out a ride for those looking for doing
something stupid.
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:40:51 PM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:
>
> Yay for Riv Chicas on new Bettys. And Riv Chicas on other bikes.
>
>
Yay for Riv Chicas on new Bettys. And Riv Chicas on other bikes.
And I hope and anticipate that we have some rides for people who don't
want to do crazy long or crazy fast (or just crazy) rides.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Hugh Smitham wrote:
> Anne,
>
> I voted, however my wife will be jo
The Betty rider in my house was good with SF. I'll have her do an official vote
Dan
On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Hugh Smitham wrote:
> Anne,
>
> I voted, however my wife will be joining in as she rides a new Betty. Though
> she might not be doing the longer rides, then again she is riding mo
Anne,
I voted, however my wife will be joining in as she rides a new Betty.
Though she might not be doing the longer rides, then again she is riding
more now that she has Betty. I know this doesn't change the men to Riv
Chica warrior ratio much but it's a start. Perhaps the others have chica
warri
The poll is depressing me. Not the closeness of the vote; that's fine,
I voted for SF Bay but either location would be wonderful. But looking
at the names... except me, it's all dudes. I knew that more men than
women bought Rivs, but 45 to 1? Riv Chicas, where are you? Cecily,
Liesl, other chicas?
FWIW I think we should have a vote on the location first then the date. As
far as two Jamborees please don't do that to me as I'll have to go to both
and I can assure you it will create a conflict betwixt me and my
significant other. Additionally, perhaps the location not chosen will be
the loc
2 people voted for all 3.
So it's currently 20 (not msp) vs 18 (either MSP). This isn't really
significant of a difference between the two choices.
It's my opinion that we won't get consensus on one site or the other. I
think it might be prudent to plan two get togethers and let the folks who
I agree that we should be voting on just one MSP date...it would be more
fairI think
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+un
Nobody voted for the second MSP option and not the first; the two MSP
options combined have more votes only because lots of people voted for
both of them. Everybody who voted MSP, for either date: 17. Everybody
who voted for China Camp: 22.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha
Also, the July 19/20 date conflicts with RAGBRAI, on which I met several
RBW bunch folks. Another vote against it for midwesterners. I'd love to
make it to Riv HQ for any of these events, but that date rules this one out.
Tim
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery <
thil
The 2 MSP options combined tally more than the single SF option. Maybe
there should be a run-off vote for the leading MSP date vs the SFO date.
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:13:18 PM UTC-5, Anne Paulson wrote:
>
> The poll has always had the SF/China Camp option leading. Right now,
> among thos
18 matches
Mail list logo
