Re: [RBW] Re: FS: New XL (59cm) Wolbis/Susie Frameset

2023-03-02 Thread Den John
Hello Paul, Is this frame still for sale? If so, would you consider shipping to Europe? Delivery from the EU to US is about $90, if it's possible to send from the US to the EU for a similar price, that would be good. I'm looking for a bike that will serve for a longish commute, and for some l

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: New XL (59cm) Wolbis/Susie Frameset

2023-02-08 Thread Brian Turner
These frames really do play better with more swept back bars… specifically any of the “_osco” bar models. I wouldn’t want anything more forward than the Toscos on my Gus… the frames are just too long for anything else, IMO.On Feb 7, 2023, at 9:10 PM, Joe Bernard wrote:You're all set. Your origina

[RBW] Re: FS: New XL (59cm) Wolbis/Susie Frameset

2023-02-07 Thread Joe Bernard
You're all set. Your original post says 58.5, 68.5 sounds correct. On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 3:24:51 PM UTC-8 Paul M wrote: > So I did measure it and came up with 68.5cm and the Riv geometry chart > shows the same for a 59cm Susie. The only 70cm ETT on the geometry chart is > the 64cm Cl

[RBW] Re: FS: New XL (59cm) Wolbis/Susie Frameset

2023-02-07 Thread brendonoid
My XL measures 68.5 also. In the latest batch Riv listed the larges (56) as a 68.5 and I assumed they made a mistake on their chart. Just a logical deduction from the ratio of other dimension changes. The ETTs go 625-640-...-685? I think the just wrote down the XLs numbers by mistake. The Ls sho

[RBW] Re: FS: New XL (59cm) Wolbis/Susie Frameset

2023-02-07 Thread Joe Bernard
I believe your ETT is a typo, the 59cm frames are closer to 70cm effective toptube. On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 8:26:49 AM UTC-8 Paul M wrote: > Purchased this frameset directly from RBW last year and never built it > into a complete bicycle. I acquired a 56cm Susie and decided to put the