I bet the reason is the steel was actually rolled to inch dimensions, which
would be 0.030", a common thickness that is basically the same as 0.76mm
Jim in Boulder
On Friday, April 27, 2012 2:33:47 AM UTC-6, newenglandbike wrote:
>
> ..
>
> "The chainstays are OX PLAT, with the odd wall thicknes
This is a steal with JB paint and JS build! I wish it were my size...
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, SISDDWG wrote:
>
> Frame, fork, and headset only
>
> Frame:
> Long-low road
> Standard
> Size: 59cm measured ctt, tt has 1 degree upslope
>
> Braze-ons:
> Shifter bosses
Not a one-off, it was, and will be again. For the moment, on the current
Bomba (and the Hunq too, I think), the reason some are using the 26.8 is
because they're using the stouter top-tube for the seat tube, until they
get another tube for use for the seat tube that will allow the 27.2
seatpos
Forget the tubing, somebody needs to buy this custom frame! What a great
bike!!!
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/eHlTYW
Not all Bombas take a 26.8. Mine (an early Diagaversion) uses 27.2, which
thankfully allowed the use of the Nitto lugged set-back post. Could very
well be that all current and future Bombas will be like yours Leslie. I
even seem to recall that the 26.8 post was the original plan. (I even had a
because i posted themwithin the last
>>> year. Or emsil me and ill send yhem from a device i can actually type
>>> on.
>>>
>>> Sent from my Kindle Fire
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Ryan Ray
>>> *Sent:* Thu Apr 26 16:1
The tube specs came with my frame order receipt.
On Apr 26, 2:18 pm, Ryan Ray wrote:
> How do you know the tubes? Was there a time when Riv told you what tubes
> they used?
>
> Iv'e been trying to find out the tubes in Rambs.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:55:43 PM UTC-7
FWIW:
While chatting w/ Riv folks awaiting my Bomba's arrival, they told me a lot
about how its built. The diagonal mid-tube is the same as the top tube;
and the seat tube is also the same tubing, which gets sized (why it has a
26.8 instead of a 27.2 seatpost); those and the downtube are all
usially not. Ram specs are published.
>> You can search this list archives because i posted themwithin the last
>> year. Or emsil me and ill send yhem from a device i can actually type
>> on.
>>
>> Sent from my Kindle Fire
>>
>>
>> -----
pe
> on.
>
> Sent from my Kindle Fire
>
>
> --
> *From:* Ryan Ray
> *Sent:* Thu Apr 26 16:18:48 CDT 2012
> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised
>
> How do you know the tu
_
From: Ryan Ray
Sent: Thu Apr 26 16:18:48 CDT 2012
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised
How do you know the tubes? Was there a time when Riv told you what tubes they
used?
Iv'e been trying to find out the tubes in Rambs.
Thanks,
How do you know the tubes? Was there a time when Riv told you what tubes
they used?
Iv'e been trying to find out the tubes in Rambs.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:55:43 PM UTC-7, SISDDWG wrote:
>
> Frame, fork, and headset only
>
> Frame:
> Long-low road
> Standard
> Si
12 matches
Mail list logo
