[RBW] Re: Atlantis vs. Hunq vs. Bomb(s)

2010-10-23 Thread Ginz
Given your size requirements, I think the best advice on the subject can be had directly from Grant. I suspect he would say Bomb'a! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@google

[RBW] Re: Atlantis vs. Hunq vs. Bomb(s)

2010-10-23 Thread Abcyclehank
Thanks for the information. I think I am certain I should save up and leap for the Bombadil when they get more in stock. Looking to get down to just 2 bikes. Looks like the Atlantis is out of the picture for now. Ryan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [RBW] Re: Atlantis vs. Hunq vs. Bomb(s)

2010-10-23 Thread erik jensen
Hard to compare the two bicycles, as they're set up differently. I do notice a degree of flex on the atlantis, that I wouldn't otherwise see on the hunqapillar--but it's possible that flex is masked by the large tires on the latter. I would say if you want to ride roads, and/or fireroads, go with

[RBW] Re: Atlantis vs. Hunq vs. Bomb(s)

2010-10-23 Thread Garth
While I've not ridden an Atlantis or Hunq, I can attest to the advantage of the upsloping TT of the Hunq and Bomba. If you ride with you bars anywhere near saddle height, this is a great advantage as you don't need a tall stem. It's like riding a frame that has a front end of a 4 cm. larger frame.

[RBW] Re: Atlantis vs. Hunq vs. Bomb(s)

2010-10-23 Thread Mike
You probably know this, but your best bet would be to call Rivendell and talk to them. When I was at RBWHQ last week I had a Bombadil in my hands, one of the newer ones with the extra supports, and it was a stout frame to say the least. Seemed like the bike to go with for big guys and/or loaded tou