Re: [RBW] Re: 33.3 vs 35 (Jack Brown vs Paselas)

2014-04-30 Thread Steve Palincsar
On 04/30/2014 05:33 PM, Cyclofiend Jim wrote: Tubes are not all that finicky when it comes to sticking them into a tire casing. I've used reealy small tubes in bigger tires with little direct issue on smooth roads. You should have seen the fun I had trying to change a flat tire i

[RBW] Re: 33.3 vs 35 (Jack Brown vs Paselas)

2014-04-30 Thread Cyclofiend Jim
Tubes are not all that finicky when it comes to sticking them into a tire casing. I've used reealy small tubes in bigger tires with little direct issue on smooth roads. You can also go up a size or so on the large end, though if you have a rim which doesn't get a good bite on the t

[RBW] Re: 33.3 vs 35 (Jack Brown vs Paselas)

2014-04-30 Thread Mathew Greiner
What size tube do I need for Jack Browns? Riv's tubes are 28–32, then 35–43. Where does 33.33*3* fit in there? I don't know what tubes I have now, though I bet they'll work fine whatever they are (supporting a 32mm tire). Still, inquiring minds want to know. Ordered some Jack Brown

[RBW] Re: 33.3 vs 35 (Jack Brown vs Paselas)

2014-04-05 Thread john
I'd go for the Jack's for sure. (Can't speak for the Blues, which I have not used, but the Greens, for sure, go for it!) The JB Greens do everything the Pasellas do but better. They're faster, more responsive, grippy, and at least for me, at least as puncture resistant. I like both tires a lot,

[RBW] Re: 33.3 vs 35 (Jack Brown vs Paselas)

2014-04-02 Thread RoadieRyan
Mattew, I ran Pasela's 700x35c on my Handsome Devil for quite some time, with fenders, and really liked them although a while ago I lost my mind, removed my fenders and crammed some 700x47c Continental touring plus' on the Devil and have been enjoying my poor mans fat bike, or is that fat mans