Re: [RBW] Re: 2017 Sam 58 vs 2022 Sam 57 Bikeinsights weirdness

2024-08-21 Thread Bill Lindsay
" that is the main selling point of the app" Agree completely. If you are spending actual money at BikeInsights you have every right to expect them to address any errors you find or suspect. I hope they square it away for you. BL in EC On Wednesday, August 21, 2024 at 6:19:40 AM UTC-7 Tom

Re: [RBW] Re: 2017 Sam 58 vs 2022 Sam 57 Bikeinsights weirdness

2024-08-21 Thread Tom
I’ve used the contact chat to see if bikeinsights has insight into the weirdness. I suspect since the data chart knows the C-T is shorter on the 57, it’s a graphic rendering issue, not a data entry issue. And yes I know tire size doesn’t make a diff if bb’s are aligned — I mentioned that as a ref

[RBW] Re: 2017 Sam 58 vs 2022 Sam 57 Bikeinsights weirdness

2024-08-21 Thread Bill Lindsay
I agree with the subject line that the "smaller" 57 is drawn taller than the "larger" 58. That is indeed weird. Regarding "another setting" or somethin you're missing, I think it may be this: the person who voluntarily submitted/entered the data for the 57cm 2017 Hillborne was almost certain