Re: [RBW] Hunqapillar da name

2010-01-26 Thread CycloFiend
on 1/26/10 8:35 AM, Bill Connell at bconn...@gmail.com wrote: > I agree, I love the more abstract names, because they can take on a > life of their own; no/few preconceived notions. I probably can't > afford a Hunqapillar, but I'll be first in line for the t-shirt. The > only one I don't care for

Re: [RBW] Hunqapillar da name

2010-01-26 Thread Bill Connell
I agree, I love the more abstract names, because they can take on a life of their own; no/few preconceived notions. I probably can't afford a Hunqapillar, but I'll be first in line for the t-shirt. The only one I don't care for is the upcoming SimpleOne because, well, it's too simple. Still and yet

Re: [RBW] Hunqapillar da name

2010-01-25 Thread cyclotourist
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Grant Petersen wrote: > brustow says: > "Nice try..but it's a dumb ass name > Is Grant directly > poking at those who deride steel as too slow, heavy and old fashioned?" > > Grant (that's me) says: > Nope, there's no deepness to the name, and that wouldn't be a di

[RBW] Hunqapillar da name

2010-01-25 Thread Grant Petersen
brustow says: "Nice try..but it's a dumb ass name Is Grant directly poking at those who deride steel as too slow, heavy and old fashioned?" Grant (that's me) says: Nope, there's no deepness to the name, and that wouldn't be a direct, anyway. Not digging the name---I get that. It's not suave or cl