Yeah Mike,
Still on the road with me till around the 17th.
Great talking to you too!
> On Aug 11, 2022, at 10:12 PM, Mike Godwin wrote:
>
> Is said bike still traveling with you Jim? I converted 88 cm to inches.
> Having a 90.5 PBH, that leaves to little clearance for the uh, gentlemen, an
Is said bike still traveling with you Jim? I converted 88 cm to inches.
Having a 90.5 PBH, that leaves to little clearance for the uh, gentlemen,
and leaves me out of the running. Dang cool bike! Great talking with you on
Saturday and wish you good journeys on the remainder of your holiday.
Mi
these are a great color. I've got one that shares time with my BMC
monstercross. Really a nice, light, fast bike and it seems like everyone
who sees it comments on the color. I run 38 Gravel Kings that are wonderful
tires.
Dan in the driftless hills of SW Wisconsin
On Wednesday, August 10, 2
Beautiful bike!
I used to have one and regret selling it. Of course with my arthritis I
probably couldn't ride it 😔
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 9:07:56 PM UTC-5 Philip Williamson wrote:
> What a great color! Rare bike, fat road tires, Golden Age fit and finish.
> I’d get this in a heartbea
What a great color! Rare bike, fat road tires, Golden Age fit and finish.
I’d get this in a heartbeat, if I didn’t already have a shiny green “French
Fit” custom.
Philip
Sonoma County, Calif
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 12:15:48 PM UTC-7 Jimmy Warren wrote:
>
> Bump: price listed includes del
Bump: price listed includes delivery from me to California buyer in August,
with no unboxing. I’d just hand over the bike. Or make offer.
I have additional photos sendable to anyone interested.
- Jimmy Warren
> On Aug 4, 2022, at 11:51 AM, James Warren wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Standover is
Hi Mike,
Standover is just under 88 cm with the Panaracer 700x37s on the bike.
- Jimmy
> On Aug 4, 2022, at 11:39 AM, Mike Godwin wrote:
>
> Hi Jim
> What is the standover height on this beautiful bike?
> Mike SLO CA
> On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 4:05:43 PM UTC-7 Jimmy Warren wrote:
>
>
The Cambium is great but it took me a while to dial it in. It's a very
different set up from a B-17 which, for me, involves making sure the nose and
rear are dead level. The Cambium worked for me when the bottom of the nose was
just above level with the ground. Before I had it dialed it was flex
Yes, I discovered the hose 'em down trick:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclotourist/16173251626
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:21 PM, mikel66...@juno.com
wrote:
> brifter internals do break but its more of a problem when the
> internals/pawls get gummed up...which usually gets fixed with a healthy
>
Although I hate the term brifters, I guess I'm forced to use it since I can no
longer call them "STI" and have people know what they mean. I'm on my original
pair of 105s, which are about as old as RBW. Granted, I never did the mileage
that most here do. I managed to take one apart and remove
brifter internals do break but its more of a problem when the internals/pawls
get gummed up...which usually gets fixed with a healthy dose of wd40 and a
re-lube
Forget the iPhone 6
1 little-known Apple supplier holds wealth-changing gro
I'm slowly moving over to the brifter-side. So convenient having them right
there where I'm already placing my hands. But I don't know if I would
actually buy some for a bike they weren't already on. It seems like they
are pretty temperamental and quick to wear as well. Almost a consumable
part
I like brifters, I just don't like how expensive they are and how prone to
failure they are.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, islaysteve wrote:
> Very nice! It's good to see another Riv owner who like brake/shifters.
> Steve
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Very nice! It's good to see another Riv owner who like brake/shifters.
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@go
How do you like the cambium? Is it very flexy?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
They're fun tires.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Joe Broach wrote:
> You should be fine. I used grub screws in the fender mounts to keep the
> gunk out without cutting into my clearance.
>
> How do like the MSOs? They've been on my radar for when my stash of Mythos
> slicks runs dry. Having
You should be fine. I used grub screws in the fender mounts to keep the
gunk out without cutting into my clearance.
How do like the MSOs? They've been on my radar for when my stash of Mythos
slicks runs dry. Having lived in Missoula, I'm partial to the name, too!
Best,
joe broach
portland, or
On
Interesting!
I've been running a Clement X'Plor MSO 700x40 on the front of my canti-Rom;
thus far I've been running a 700x35 Ritchey Speedmax on the rear, to ensure
clearance, but have been wanting to see if the MSO would fit back there, too
H
--
You received this message bec
I happened to have the fenders off and played around with a few tires. I've
always wondered what I could fit in back (front clearance is greater). I
think I found the limit with a 700x40 (38mm casing, 41.5mm knobs):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclerslife/14651847681/in/photostream/
https://www.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:40 PM, James Warren wrote:
>
> everything the same
> except for the presence of canti posts
...and Atlantis seatstays (according to the June '05 Email update) and
a threaded, downward facing rear fender boss with no hole for mounting
a rear sidepull. But, yes, clearanc
everything the same
except for the presence of canti posts
A miscommunication with Toyo lead to cantis in the batch, and Rivendell decided
to go with it.
On Nov 25, 2011, at 11:46 AM, rcnute wrote:
> Were these built for more tire clearance (longer fork blades, higher
> chainstay bridge) tha
Were these built for more tire clearance (longer fork blades, higher
chainstay bridge) than the sidepull ones? Or is everything the same
except for the presence of canti posts? Just wondering.
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch"
FYI, no association with seller, etc:
http://humboldt.craigslist.org/bik/2496630159.html
--
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA
*...in terms of recreational cycling there are many riders who would
probably benefit more from
improving their taste than from improving their performance.* - RTMS
--
You r
Mine does. Since there was only one batch, all of them should.
On 9/23/2010 3:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, andrew hill wrote:
hi folks,
i'm in negotiations to pick up a canti-Romulus frameset, and dreaming about the
eventual build.
one question - looking at pick
BW Owners Bunch
>Subject: [RBW] Canti-rom and dt shifters?
>
>hi folks,
>
>i'm in negotiations to pick up a canti-Romulus frameset, and dreaming about
>the eventual build.
>one question - looking at picks of the Rom around the interwebs, about half of
>em i see have
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, andrew hill wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> i'm in negotiations to pick up a canti-Romulus frameset, and dreaming about
> the eventual build.
> one question - looking at picks of the Rom around the interwebs, about half
> of em i see have downtube shifters.
>
> does this
hi folks,
i'm in negotiations to pick up a canti-Romulus frameset, and dreaming about the
eventual build.
one question - looking at picks of the Rom around the interwebs, about half of
em i see have downtube shifters.
does this mean that a stock (canti) Romulus have bosses for the dt shifters?
on 9/3/10 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal at skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, roadrunner wrote:
>> FWIW: I am running Marathon 35s on Mavic 622x19 rims with SKS fenders
>> just fine on my 59 cm Canti-Romulus. All in preparation for packed
>> gravel rail-trails riding in Virginia in
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, roadrunner wrote:
> FWIW: I am running Marathon 35s on Mavic 622x19 rims with SKS fenders
> just fine on my 59 cm Canti-Romulus. All in preparation for packed
> gravel rail-trails riding in Virginia including the Virginia Creeper
> and New River in a few weeks. Rod
FWIW: I am running Marathon 35s on Mavic 622x19 rims with SKS fenders
just fine on my 59 cm Canti-Romulus. All in preparation for packed
gravel rail-trails riding in Virginia including the Virginia Creeper
and New River in a few weeks. Rode same across the Southern Tier and
the Pacific Coast(Seatt
Mike,
I can run a 100mm stem but then I get pain in my neck as I'm not so
flexible anymore. I believe that unless one is sort of
disproportionate, Riv bikes fit really well based on PBH. Make some
allowances for flexibility if you will. With your PBH being lower than
mine, I'd say we're both ridin
I'm 5'11" with PBH of 89.5 and ride a 61cm AHH with 35mm tires and a
61cm Atlantis with 50mm tires. The Atlantis with the 50mm tires is
quite taller, but gives me enough clearance. Bigger tires, assuming
they'd fit would make it uncomfortable but still rideable.
The top tube is perfect and I use 8
I am just shy of 6'2" (PBH of 89) and ride a 63cm Canti Rom, usually
with 28's or 32's. Works for me, but did seem a little tall at first. Ralph
jandrews_nyc wrote:
Hi,
I am helping a friend who is interested in purchasing a used
Cantilever Romulus. His PBH is 84. The bike is a 59. Riv websi
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:32 AM, jandrews_nyc wrote:
> Hi,
> I am helping a friend who is interested in purchasing a used
> Cantilever Romulus. His PBH is 84. The bike is a 59. Riv website
> says for most smaller/av riders its PBH minus around 25 to get frame
> size...thats 84-25 = 59!but I'
Hi,
I am helping a friend who is interested in purchasing a used
Cantilever Romulus. His PBH is 84. The bike is a 59. Riv website
says for most smaller/av riders its PBH minus around 25 to get frame
size...thats 84-25 = 59!but I'm nervous it will be way up there
and the Romulus geometry char
heme on my Atlantis, but if they
had gone much further with either, I would not have been as keen on the look.
--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Seth Vidal wrote:
From: Seth Vidal
Subject: [RBW] canti-rom
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 5:08 AM
I just received the
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> I just received the canti-rom frame/fork last night. It is in rather
> stunning shape and after looking it over I have to ask:
>
> Does anyone know why riv stopped making the simpler lug design? The
> more ornate lugs like on the AHH and atlanti
Seth Vidal asked:
Does anyone know why riv stopped making the simpler lug design? The
more ornate lugs like on the AHH and atlantis are beautiful but there
is something nicely understated about the ones on the romulus.
---
IIRC, Grant Petersen generally prefers lugs to be more on the ornate
I just received the canti-rom frame/fork last night. It is in rather
stunning shape and after looking it over I have to ask:
Does anyone know why riv stopped making the simpler lug design? The
more ornate lugs like on the AHH and atlantis are beautiful but there
is something nicely understated ab
39 matches
Mail list logo
