I tried JB's (Green - haven't ridden the Blues) when they first came out -
back when the Paselas tended to be slightly undersized for the stated
dimension. The difference seemed noticeable, but probably was not free
from observer bias. I had a hard time convincing myself to put the Paselas
ba
+1 on JB Greens. For me on my Riv custom they are mighty fine. I've even
hoarded a supply just in case
-JimD
On Apr 5, 2014, at 11:44 PM, john wrote:
> I'd go for the Jack's for sure. (Can't speak for the Blues, which I have not
> used, but the Greens, for sure, go for it!) The JB Greens do
I like em both, but have found the slight size difference gives Jack
Brown a benefit on my older frames, where the Pasela x35 is sometimes
just that much too big to clear chainstays...
=- Joe Bunik
Walnut Creek, CA
On 4/2/14, cyclotourist wrote:
> Both are great tires, Mathew. I love Paselas tho
Both are great tires, Mathew. I love Paselas though, and think the 35mm
ones are the perfect tire. They roll pretty fast for such inexpensive
tires, and the extra bit of float is definitely nicer if you get into any
soft sand (you didn't mention where you would be riding them). Puncture
protection
Hi Mathew,
The Jack Brown and Paselas are both good tires. The Jack Brown would
be a little smoother, but a little more expensive.
Toshi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema
Sorry if this is an old, worn out topic. My main question is to do with the
benefits of a smoother rolling tire (Jack Brown) vs a slightly fatter tire. The
Pasela isn't that much larger than the Jack Brown, but on the other hand, the
Jack Brown isn't that much larger than my current tires. Both
