> > Because the main purpouse of dark modes is not to alter colours altogether,
> > it's to avoid large fields of pure bright white. As you'll find in
> > Wikipedia or default Gmail's backgrounds (or Github, now that I see it).
>
> And in order to do that, you have to alter colors. You change th
> I get that people are scared that we will mess up the map. It's normal for
> users to be afraid of UI changes even when they are good for them long term.
> But just saying that it isn't gonna work isn't productive.
It's also not helpful to dismiss other opinions with "people don't know how
th
> and if we implement some straightforward preferences (e.g. auto/light/dark
> prefs for UI and/or maps) then I think most people will be reasonably happy
> with the outcome
> That's what you'll get if there's an option for the map mode independent of
> the ui mode.
@gravitystorm @AntonKhorev
> I haven't seen any substantial counter-proposal to my "option 4c" suggestion
> ("Cartographers choose") earlier:
@gravitystorm Actually I wrote one, but it got lost in mine and others' wall of
text 😅
I'll rephrase here, also because things changed a lot with the recent (welcome)
introductio
First of all I want to thank all devs for their works. As I stated in the OSM
board I have zero experience in programming, so I can at most nag about...
ahem, offer my personal advice on choices 😁
@gravitystorm please help me understand the difference between Option 1 and 4.
>From what I get, i
