ppKrauss left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#1807)
**Solution** proposal: use another [domain
name](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name), and redirect the *geocode
resolution* to OpenStreetMap (or others like [Wikipedia's
Geohack](https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?
karussell left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6011)
Have done so.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6011#issuecomment-2876046130
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Mess
There are some minor updates to the latest GraphHopper API e.g. `vehicle` was
deprecated a few years ago.
Also there is no longer a need for the parameter `turn_costs` (related #2695).
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetma
@karussell pushed 1 commit.
0c12b1158ad587a1ac74b22e4e30a8e6c3e2b040 Update graphhopper.js
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6011/files/d8eb6ad4366b50dd51958979b5cc06d99971d2ec..0c12b1158ad587a1ac74b22e4e30a8e6c3e2b040
You are receiving this becau
ppKrauss left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#1807)
@erik55 You're on the right track when you say, "We just need interoperability
and standards". We also need infrastructure to demonstrate usage, enable
testing, and build an ecosystem. In this context we need to:
1. Discuss here
karussell left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6011)
Thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6011#issuecomment-2877766376
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID
