Hello Ricky -
I don't quite understand your question, sorry.
If you want to use the shadow file, you can either use an AuthBy UNIX clause
and point it at the shadow file directly, or you can use an AuthBy SYSTEM
(possibly with the UseGetspnamf parameter).
Have a look at sections 6.25 and 6.3
Hello Michael -
I don't think that a PreClientHook is the right way to go about this.
If you are going to keep the number matrix in a database, it is probably
easiest to just use two AuthBy SQL clauses - the first one to check the
numbers and the second one to check the users.
hth
Hugh
On
Hello Toni -
You have discovered the reason for the existence of the AuthBy GROUP clause.
Ie. you cannot change an AuthByPolicy part way through a list of AuthBy
clauses, so you need different lists.
So here is what to do:
Identifier Auth-SQL
...
Account
Hello Jaime -
The first example that you show below is incorrect and not supported.
The second example is correct.
regards
Hugh
On Monday 01 October 2001 22:08, Jaime Elizaga Jr. wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
>
> I just need some inputs on which config would provide a more efficient
> running
Hello Anton -
This should be quite easy to do with an AuthBy PORTLIMITCHECK clause
(together with a SessionDatabase SQL).
Have a look at section 6.41 in the Radiator 2.18.4 reference manual.
regards
Hugh
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 03:55, Anton Krall wrote:
> > Guys.
>
> I just enabled a s
Hello Alireza -
The latest version of Radiator is 2.18.4 - you should use that.
Please let me know if you still have problems, and send me the complete
transcript of the steps you have followed.
thanks
Hugh
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 05:16, Alireza Veiseh wrote:
> > I just downloaded the
Hello George -
You can use the "OutPort nnn" parameter in the AuthBy RADIUS clause to force
the use of a particular port number. This parameter is supported in Radiator
2.18.1 and later - note that the current version is Radiator 2.18.4.
regards
Hugh
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 01:14, PANAG
Hello Kevin -
This seems quite strange - can you please send me a copy of the configuration
file (no secrets) together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?
BTW - the latest version of Radiator is 2.18.4.
thanks
Hugh
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 07:33, Kevin McKee wrote:
> When I t
Hello Jesus -
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 10:25, Jesus Duarte wrote:
> Hello
>
> I want to set a MAXSESSIONTIME for all users. Can I do that with the
> config file with an AddToReply statement instead of adding that field to
> all user accounts? If so, what is the syntax?
>
# define AuthBy
Hello Amy -
This doesn't really have a radius equivalent (as far as I know), however
there are lots of things that you can do with Cisco's using the "cisco-avpair
..." construct, so you should check with Cisco what is possible. You should
also be aware that there are *major* differences in ra
Hello Shane -
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 16:51, Shane Malden wrote:
> > We are looking at purchasing a copy of Radiator but I was just after some
> opinion on it?? Also one of our Main features was to Proxy the Requests off
> to another Radius Product (RSA ACE/Server) and have Radiator reply wi
Hello Ali -
You will first of all need to start Radiator (radiusd) as a service on the
ports that you want it to listen on. Then you will be able to send
authentication requests to it and it should respond.
Note that you can also use the "radpwtst" program for testing.
hth
Hugh
On Tuesday
Hello Ian -
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 17:51, Ian Burgess wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have got involved in a radiator config. Everything is running. We are
> adding more network functionality (DSL) connections.
>
> The Telco insists that the Accounting response to the stop record have
> certain attributes
Hello Andrew -
What is "radmon.sh"?
In any case, I suspect there is something missing in the environment when the
script is run as the user that cron runs as. Either that or permissions
problems for the same reason.
BTW - we provide a tool called "restartWrapper" for this purpose (in the
go
Hello Camillo -
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 23:52, Camilo A. Echeverry wrote:
> Hi All ..
>
> i want to know how to use a different IP pool for each group in my
> machine:
>
> eg.
> group staff uses 192.168.0.XX 255.255.255.0
> group admin uses 192.168.1.XX 255.255.255.0
>
You can either assign
Hello Andre -
Could you please send me a copy of your configuration file (no secrets)
together with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening?
If it is the router that is complaining, it sounds like the router has not
even sent the request yet, so Radiator would not be involved
Hello Ian -
>
> I have NT4 with radiator.
>
> I have a Telco proxying requests to me.
>
> he tells me that my radius stops responding to his proxy. I restart the
> service and he is happy again.
>
> logs show no activity for the period he believes that I am disconnected.
> This is the only app o
Hello Josh -
You can't do what you describe with a simple AcctColumnDef, however you can
certainly do it with an AcctSQLStatement.
Have a look at section 6.28.15 in the Radiator 2.18.4 reference manual.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday 04 October 2001 06:47, Ward, Josh wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I'm a new r
Hello Eric -
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 22:40, Eric Castaneda wrote:
> We are running Radiator 2.18.4 using Authby LDAP2 to authenticate
> users against Open LDAP 2.0.7. We need to have "detail" type logging
> that is enabled by using the "AcctLogFileName" option in the radius.cfg
> fil
Hello Ricardo -
Radiator does not support dynamic DNS updates.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday 04 October 2001 00:51, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
> > Hi, any was implemented a dynamic DNS with radiator and bind ?
> Any know good information about this stuff ?
>
> RDA.-
--
Hello Rod -
>
> I finally got my validation process working with multiple
> sections, but am still
> not getting any entries in the AcctLogFileName file.
>
> If I run the radpwtst program, it DOES put a start and stop entry into that
> AcctLogFileName file,
> but actual dialup validations are
Hello -
There are some example hooks in the file "goodies/hooks.txt" in the Radiator
distribution.
hth
Hugh
>
> Below is a realm file this works ok but when I have tried to make this
> AddToReply as part of a postauthHook as a addtoreplyifnotexit for all
> default users but if user x,y,k t
Hello Lloyd -
You cannot do what you show below, you will need two separate AuthBy SQL
clauses. What else are you doing in the configuration file?
regards
Hugh
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 19:36, lloyd dagoc wrote:
> hello,
> i just want to ask if this can be done...i want to split acct sto
Hello John -
The latest versions are Radiator 2.18.4 and Radmin 1.5.
On Thursday 04 October 2001 08:32, John Edward wrote:
> > Hello
>
> We have bought Radiator and Radmin, we installed Radiator 2.18.2 using
> an AuthNT.pm file from a old version 2.14.x because the AuthNT.pm
> version 2.18.2 n
Hello Ricky -
In the file that you use for the AuthBy FILE (%D/users) you could simply add
those users that you want to lock out like this:
# %d/users
user1 Password = *
..
hth
Hugh
On Friday 05 October 2001 01:06, ricky wrote:
> > Guys,
>
> I noticed a couple of years back someo
Hello Ivan -
I will need to see a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) together
with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is going on.
thanks
Hugh
On Friday 05 October 2001 01:48, Ivan Arias wrote:
> hi
>
> I just install a NAS 5300 (Cisco Asscess Server) in my network
> It is
Hello Andreas -
This is fairly straightforward to implement.
Here is how to do it:
# radius.cfg
AuthPort1645
AcctPort1646
# define Client(s)
Secret mysecret
DupInterval 0
# define AuthBy(s)
Identifier CheckFILE
Filename
Hello Anton -
On Friday 05 October 2001 14:31, Anton Krall wrote:
> > Guys.. I have 2 questions:
>
Only two?
:-)
> 1. I need to send the accounting info to 2 diff. databases so I created
> 2 sessiondatbases clauses now.. my question is... can I send the
> accounting using 2 sessiondatba
Hello Stephen -
Thanks for sending the configuration and accounting output.
You will notice that the Acct-Delay-Time attribute is shown as 0, 5, 10 in
each of the succeeding packets. This indicates that the Cisco has not
received an accounting response and is resending the request.
>From you
Hello William -
On Friday 05 October 2001 08:00, William Hernandez wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We use handlers in our radius.cfg such as
>
>
> Identifier prdigital
> SessionDatabase prw-sessiondb
> AuthBy prdigital-plat
>
> PostAuthHook file:"/etc/raddb/setSessi
ton Krall wrote:
> What if password are in some other file? The pw file is a sql genertaed
> file..
>
> Saludos
>
> Anton Krall
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Jueves, 04 de Octubre de 2001 06:22 p.m.
> To: A
Hello Jesus -
The default DeleteQuery already uses NASIDENTIFIER and NASPORT - why have you
changed it? It seems to me that simply using the correct query will fix the
problem. Note that you can add the USERNAME to the delete query too if you
need to.
hth
Hugh
On Friday 05 October 2001 10
adius::AuthFILE ACCEPT:
> Fri Oct 5 10:10:31 2001: DEBUG: Handling with Radius::AuthSQL
> Fri Oct 5 10:10:31 2001: INFO: Access rejected for mike@test:
> Authentication disabled
> Fri Oct 5 10:10:31 2001: DEBUG: Packet dump:
> *** Sending to 212.73.0.14 port 49152
> C
Hello Todd -
On Saturday 06 October 2001 02:32, Todd Dokey wrote:
> Is there a way to enforce MaxSessions across different Clients?
>
> I have a problem with people using the same login in San Francisco and Los
> Angeles.
>
> By and large, they both are dealt with by the Default Client and Defau
Hello William -
It looks to me like the shared secrets are incorrect (or the password is
wrong).
The trace that you show correcly indicates the SQL query that was run for
this user 'cumminspr':
> Fri Oct 5 15:03:26 2001: DEBUG: Query is: select password,
> active, timeleft, bl
> ockuser, gu
Hello Dave -
I will need to see a copy of the configuration file (no secrets) together
with a trace 4 debug showing the startup messages.
Are you sure you don't have a second definition for 192.168.5.21 further down
in your configuration file that is overwriting the first?
regards
Hugh
On
Hello Rafi -
Vendor 2352 is Redback, so you should add the Redback vendor specifics to the
standard dictionary file with your favourite text editor (from
dictionary.redback).
The problem with the accounting requests can probably be fixed with the
following:
# define Merit Client clause with
Hello David -
On Thursday 18 October 2001 11:57, David Napier wrote:
> Thanx for the reply High, can't fault this service :)
>
We try to please.
Actually, we try to be *much* better than any other product and any other
support you have ever seen.
> > The first question of course is "what ha
Hello Anura -
This is undoubtedly because you are not sending a correct Service-Type in the
access accept, which Cisco's require. You will need to add at least the
following to the reply:
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
..
If you need further he
Hi Wim -
On Thursday 18 October 2001 23:55, Wim Biemolt wrote:
> Hello Hugh,
>
> ==> From: Hugh Irvine
>
> > You are defining the attributes as vendor specifics, but Radiator is
> > complaining about standard attributes. Here is how to define them:
> >
>
Salut Jerome -
Merci pour ca!
I have copied Mike on this mail and he will consider the patch for inclusion
in the next release.
A+
Hugues
On Thursday 18 October 2001 20:00, Jerome Fleury wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 16, 2001 09:57:17 AM +0200 Jesús M Díaz
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Wim -
I have copied Mike on this mail and the manual will be clarified for the next
release. Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency.
regards
Hugh
On Friday 19 October 2001 00:04, Wim Biemolt wrote:
> Hola Mariano, Hello Hugh,
>
> ==> From: Hugh Irvine
>
> > Yes
Hello Suwat -
The latest version of Radmin has support for per-user and per-service check
and reply attributes.
You should upgrade to Radmin-1.5.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday 18 October 2001 22:05, Suwat Charoensakpanich wrote:
> Hello...
> I use RADMIN for manage user on MySQL.It's
> w
/var/log/radacct/detail
>
>
> Does it make sense? Do I need an AuthBy clause if I'm only
> handling Accounting-Request?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> William
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 200
Hello Lloyd -
On Saturday 20 October 2001 18:13, lloyd dagoc wrote:
> hello,
>
> just wondering if RADIATOR can send a signal to NAS to disconnect a
> particular usercan RADIATOR do that? if yes , how?
>
Radiator cannot do it directly, however if your NAS software supports the new
radius "
Hello Shanaka -
On Friday 19 October 2001 13:58, Shanaka Rabel wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
> I wrote to u sometime back regarding a pre-paid solution on a Radiator.
> Thanx for the help:-)
>
> I need one more suggestion from you. I want to call a rating engine when
> a login request comes thru, and then s
Hello Robert -
Probably the simplest and easiest thing to do in your situation is to proxy
the radius requests to a copy of Radiator running on the MSSQL host, and then
just use the native ODBC support there.
regards
Hugh
On Saturday 20 October 2001 01:33, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> We are cu
Hello Rick -
On Saturday 20 October 2001 16:12, ricky wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I am seeing 'Acct-Status-Type = Alive' in the logs from my comindico ports.
>
> Is this something to do with V.92?
>
> How should one of these things be treated for accouting information. Is
> there a an 'Dead' or 'NotAlive
Hello Abdul -
On Sunday 21 October 2001 23:12, Abdul Rehman Saeed wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to route a IP pool like 210.56.13.0/29 to a dailup user.if any body
> help me with example in this regard I will be very thankful to him.
>
> Also another question is I would like to route selected IP addr
Hello Lloyd -
Just what it says - somewhere in your configuration you have incorrectly
specified an "Attribute = value" pair. This usually seems to happen with
GENERIC SQL definitions that only have a value in them (like "116000" or
"72000") instead of the "Attribute = value" syntax.
hth
Hu
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: radpwtst
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 05:17:56 +0100
From: "Paul O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also in the unlikely event that anyone else is interested in it I have
Hello Hakim -
Please send me a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) together with a
trace 4 debug showing what is going on and a description of what was working,
what is not working now, and what you have changed.
thanks
Hugh
On Monday 22 October 2001 17:28, hakim wrote:
> hi all!!
Hello Ralph -
On Monday 22 October 2001 18:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> From faq, manual and mailing list archive it is not completely clear if
> - Windows NT4 supports radius authentication of PPTP endpoints
> - What is necessary on the Windows NT side
> - What is necessary on the Radi
Hello Steve -
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 05:12, Stephen Caporossi wrote:
> I am trying to setup radiator to log our VPN users to a different file
> than PPP users. We have several PPP and VPN servers and I do not want
> each to log to it's own file. Is there a way to do this? Is there some
>
Hello Andy -
On Monday 22 October 2001 23:46, Andy De Petter wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Anyone heard of an issue with RedBack sending back malformed vendor
> specific attributes with length 6? I've been having this problem for
> months now, and still no solution found for it. It's not bothering
Hello Hakim -
Thanks for sending the trace file.
The messages that you show below are not from Radiator - where are they from?
I am guessing that there is something wrong with the installation of the
ucd-snmp package. Note this package is now called net-snmp and is found on
Sourceforge (www.
Hello Martin -
Why don't you just use two AuthBy SQL clauses with different AuthSelect
statements?
# define AuthBy SQL statements
Identifier CheckNewUserName
.
AuthSelect select password from \
serviceuser where id_user = '%n'
AuthColumnDef
Hello Dave -
There are two problems in what you show below.
The first is that you have the AddressPool definition commented out, so there
are no addresses configured in the AuthBy DYNADDRESS.
The second is that you have not defined a PoolHint to say where you want the
address to come from.
Title: Re: (RADIATOR)
Hello -
Hello, I
wonder if you can help me a couple Radiator configuration
problems.
OK.
1. It seem
that Radiator is disconecting users ( dial-up), the disconection
cause appears NULL. This doesn't happen to all of our users, only to
some. Some of them are disconne
Hello Ray -
>Hi all, I have just restored a Linux system that had a hard drive failure
>and I am having a problem starting radiusd. Previously I always started
>radiusd from /etc/rc5.d and never had a problem. Now it starts fine but the
>first authentication request causes radiusd to die. The
Hello Lloyd -
>hello,
>can i do this in an AuthBy SQL??
>
> Session-Timeout = Class <<- this is basically my question
>
> AuthColumnDef 0,Encrypted-Password,check
> AuthColumnDef 1,Filter-Id,reply
> AuthColumnDef 2,Session-Timeout,reply
> AuthColumnDef 3,Simultaneous-
Hello Todd -
Keep in mind that there are different things happening with what is output
from Radiator. Standard error, debug, info messages and so on (controlled by
the Trace setting) go to the LogFile or clause or whatever. The
is only used for authentication logging. And the accounting
r
Hello Utku -
On Thursday 25 October 2001 19:09, Utku Er wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first I want to thank Hugh for the answering to my last question...
>
> I want to make sure that when radiator (lets say A) proxy requests to
> another proxy (lets say B) do I loose the original requester NAS
> inform
Hello Masoud -
It looks like you are doing most things correctly in your Radiator
configuration, but I suspect you may have a problem because you are not
sending the addtional attributes required by the Cisco.
You will need to add at least what is shown below:
DBSource
Hello Mike -
I will need to know a bit more about what you mean below.
And can you also tell me what platform you are running on?
There is a very extensively documented example configuration file in the
distribution in the file called "radius.cfg" that you should have a look at.
It contains
Hello Gustavo -
Quite right - many thanks for pointing this out.
I have copied Mike on this mail and the manual will be corrected for the next
release.
Thanks!
Hugh
On Thursday 25 October 2001 23:56, Gustavo Moreira wrote:
> You have an error in Radiator Reference manual. In (6.7.6 CountQu
Hello Kieran -
Please send me a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) and a trace 4
debug from Radiator showing what is happening.
BTW - there is an extensively documented example configuration file in the
distribution in the file called "radius.cfg".
thanks
Hugh
On Friday 26 Octob
Hello Craig -
Radiator 2.18.4 will operate correctly in spite of the message.
The makefile has been corrected for the next release (due out in the next
couple of days).
Thanks for reporting the problem.
regards
Hugh
On Friday 26 October 2001 09:26, Massey, Craig wrote:
> We've just attemp
Ciao Giuseppe -
Radiator will automatically handle CHAP-Password as long as you have the
cleartext password available in the user defintion.
regards
Hugh
On Friday 26 October 2001 01:08, Giuseppe Denora wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I' m trying to set up a Radiator Authenticator using the clau
Hello Abdul Rehman -
When you configure Radiator to operate as a radius proxy, it will send all
radius requests to the radius target including authentication and accounting.
If you wish to record the accounting records locally as well, that is very
easy to accomplish. Here is an example:
#
Hello Julien -
As far as I can see in the debug below, you are sending back an access accept
within one second of receiving the request. However, there are no reply
attributes set, so perhaps that is your problem?
You would usually do something like this:
.
Hello Martin -
The simplest way to do what you describe is with Handlers.
# define a special Handler to trap bogus accounting
.
Note that you should not mix Realms and Handlers in the same configuration
file. Convert any Realms like this:
becomes
It is usually much easie
Hello Dave -
On Saturday 27 October 2001 01:31, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
> One question I've always had...
>
> Given an accounting record:
>
> Wed Mar 28 17:08:50 2001
> User-Name = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Service-Type = Framed-User
> NAS-IP-Address = 103.73.154.6
> NA
Hello Atif -
You would use an AuthBy UNIX clause.
Have a look at section 6.25 in the Radiator reference manual (included in the
distribution in the file "doc/ref.html".
There is also an extensively documented example configuration file in the
distribution in the file called "radius.cfg".
re
Hello Mark -
On Monday 29 October 2001 07:41, Mark - Orcon Support wrote:
> The new SQLRADIUS function looks awesome, so thanks Hugh and the team for
> all your work on the continued new features for Radiator.
>
Most of the thanks should go to Mike - he's the one who writes the code!
> I was h
Hi Steve -
On Monday 29 October 2001 11:41, Steve Roderick wrote:
> At 09:44 AM 10/29/2001 +1000, you wrote:
> >I think we will wait to see if anyone else has ideas for further
> > enhancements and then we will incorporate all of them in Radiator 2.19.1.
>
> Actually I have a "HostColumnDefs" pi
Hello Nir -
If I understand you correctly you are trying to test simultaneous use
with the radpwtst program? You need to be a bit careful doing this
because of the way Radiator maintains the session database. When
Radiator receives an access request it first of all deletes any
existing sessi
Hello Mariano -
Thanks for the kind words - we appreciate it.
And I'm glad that we are keeping you happy - if you have any more
good ideas for Radiator please let us know!
regards
Hugh
>El 28 Oct 2001 a las 13:08, Mike McCauley escribió:
>
>> We are pleased to announce the release of Rad
Hello Onno -
How nice to hear from you - hope everything is going well?
I have copied this to Mike to ask him to have a look at if for you.
regards
Hugh
>Hi All,
>
>I am trying to send tagged tunneling attributes with radiator and having
>some problems. I have read the FAQ/manual as per
>"
Title: Re: (RADIATOR) default gateway
Hello Anton -
I suppose you could use the "Framed-Route" attribute,
however I think this is much more likely to be entirely dependent on
the NAS and PPP client.
You will have to check with your NAS vendor to see what options
are available.
regards
Hugh
Hello Arwin -
>Hello,
>
>How can I add a session-timeout attribute on a per client basis?
>When I use AddToReply SessionTimeout=1800 in a handler, it works fine for
>this handler.
>But I want to do this on a per client basis. I think I'll have to use some
>sort of hook,
>but the client clause o
Hello Arwin -
>Hello,
>
>How can I add a session-timeout attribute on a per client basis?
>When I use AddToReply SessionTimeout=1800 in a handler, it works fine for
>this handler.
>But I want to do this on a per client basis. I think I'll have to use some
>sort of hook,
>but the client clause o
Hello Wayne -
The problem here is due to the fact that the NAS-Port value in all
the access requests is always 0, therefore Radiator gets confused
because the NAS-IP-Address/NAS-Port combination is what is used for
the maintenance of the session database.
You will have to check with your ven
Hello Matthew -
The following is defined in the standard dictionary contained in the
Radiator 2.19 distribution.
ATTRIBUTE EAP-Message 79 binary
What dictionary are you using?
BTW - you should always start with the standard Radiator dictionary
and add or remove defini
Salut Julien -
You will have to check with the Ariel vendor to find out why this is.
It may also be an issue with your telephone service that does not
supply that information in the call setup data.
regards
Hugh
>Radiator is not receiving the "Called-Station-Id" in the
>"Access-Request"
>
Hello Gustavo -
Have you installed and configured the DBI/DBD modules for Perl?
regards
Hugh
>Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to set up a radiator server with a MySQL server only to
>assign three address pools. The trouble is that radiator can't connect to
>the sql server, and I don't unders
Hello Jay -
Thanks for pointing this out. Like the previous case, this is
inoccuous and will be fixed in the next release.
cheers
Hugh
>
> > >Greetings;
>> >
>> >A few weeks ago we mentioned that on a fresh install of radiator 2.18,
>> > which was being done on a freshly installed FreeB
Hello Lisa -
>Hi all,
>
>I'm hoping someone out there has seen similar problems.
>
>In our set up of proxies and customer radius servers(all Radiators) we
>periodically experience near blackouts. The users get a busy signal. The
>problems occur only with Cisco 5800s. The Nortel CVX arena is usua
Hello Wayne -
The correct syntax for a cisco-avpair is as follows:
cisco-avpair = "ip:dns-servers=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"
note the quotes.
regards
Hugh
>My ADSL radwho is working now thanks to Gareth's suggestion. I am trying to
>use cisco-avpair = ip:dns-servers=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx but radia
Hello Gustavo -
>Hugh:
>
> Yes, but there was any troubles with it...
> I've fixed it and now it's working.
>
> Thanks to all that have helped me.
>
> In addition of all this stuff, I have another "little" doubt...
>
> I need to authenticate users from 5 realms in s
Hello Manoj -
What does a trace 4 debug from Radiator show? Is the reply attribute
actually being sent in the reply correctly? If it is in the reply,
you will then have to check on the Cisco to see what the Cisco is
doing with the reply. You can use the debug command on the Cisco to
see what
Hello Barry -
Yes this is very simple to do.
# define AuthBy clauses
Identifier SQLAccounting
DBSource .
DBUsername .
DBAuth .
AuthSelect
AccountingTable ACCOUNTING
AcctCloumnDef .
.
Identifier Chec
Hello Andrew -
It looks to me like the shared secrets are different between the NAS
and the Client clause. You only show an accounting request and if
this is only happening with accounting requests (ie. authentication
requests are working) then it is likely a software bug in the NAS
that the
Hello William -
>Hello everyone,
>
>I have the following in radius.cfg:
> AcctLogFileFormat \
> %U \
> %{NAS-IP-Address} \
> %{NAS-Identifier} \
> %{Acct-Status-Type} \
> %{Acct-Session-Id} \
>
).
regards
Hugh
>Hi Hugh,
>
>I still want to authenticate by the UNIX passwd file for the time being but
>write accounting records to mySQL. Is thsi the correct config for that
>scenario?
>
>Barry
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL
Framed-IP-Address =
> VTS-Session-Key =
> Call-Arrived-time =
> Ascend-NAS-Port-Format =
> Ascend-Multilink-ID =
> Ascend-Num-In-Multilink =
> Acct-Link-Count =
> Acct-Multi-Session-Id =
> Ascend-Modem-PortNo
Hello Mike -
At 12:38 -0800 01/11/2, Mike Greene wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We have just started using the session limit for our TotalControl
>and Livingston NAS'es with pretty good results. I'm now looking
>into how we can poll our Cisco 7206VXR for aDSL connections. I see
>that Radiator utilizes
Hello Kieran -
Radiator does not have any command line "commands", although it does
accept a number of command line options. You will find the complete
reference manual in the file "doc/ref.html" in the distribution, and
you can also use the "-h" flag to get a usage printout.
> radiu
Hello Ronan -
>
>
> For some reason, the portmasters are not authenticating users.
>Looking at the trace of the Radiator log shows that it is sending
>"Access-Accept" packets back to the portmasters, but the users are still
>being disconnected. Users can authenticate properly with the Cis
Hello AbdusSami -
At 12:35 +0300 01/11/4, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Once the user disconnected, if it is still showing in radonline table. Does
>it create the problem to reconnect, and maxsession is 1.
If the entry for the user is still in the session database, then yes
there wi
901 - 1000 of 5222 matches
Mail list logo
