Re: [RADIATOR] Random AuthBy LDAP2 "Undefined subroutine &main::" connect failures

2012-08-26 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 08/25/2012 02:34 AM, Kevin Schmidt wrote: > I've been using Radiator in support of a variety of services for years, > but I just ran into a really strange bug. If someone has an idea of > what's happening, or a particularly good debugging technique to find the > root cause, I'm all ears. T

Re: [RADIATOR] Multiple AuthBy Radius hosts

2012-08-26 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 08/26/2012 09:59 AM, eliran shlomo wrote: > Hi, i tried it and it send the first packet to both of the AuthBy server > and then it sends it to the authby1 only. Can you reply with your current configuration. You need one AuthBy clause for each server you want to forward the request to. Within

Re: [RADIATOR] Multiple AuthBy Radius hosts

2012-08-26 Thread eliran shlomo
Identifier ProxyAccounting Host * NoForwardAuthentication AcctPort 1813 FailureBackoffTime 180 Retries 1 RetryTimeout 3 Secret *** Identifier ProxyAccounting71 Host *** NoForwardAuthentic

Re: [RADIATOR] Multiple AuthBy Radius hosts

2012-08-26 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
The configuration looks fine. It should send the request to two destinations: ProxyAccounting and ProxyAccounting71. You could do the following: Change FailureBackoffTime to 0 to make sure the request is always forwarded even if the next hop host is down. Also, add IgnoreAccountingResponse to both

[RADIATOR] Radiator high Availability

2012-08-26 Thread sergio
I use Radiator 4.10 and I need to place a second radiator and I use FreeBSD, but I need a solution to the sessions (SessionDatabase SQL) is well synchronized since I use mysql. A mysql replication via resolves or is there a better solution? I also thought about using FreeBSD with CARP. Thanks

Re: [RADIATOR] Multiple AuthBy Radius hosts

2012-08-26 Thread eliran shlomo
Changing the FailureBackoffTime to 0 and adding the IgnoreAccountingResponse solved the problem thanks for the help. 2012/8/26 Heikki Vatiainen > The configuration looks fine. It should send the request to two > destinations: ProxyAccounting and ProxyAccounting71. > > You could do the followin