Hello Mushtaque -
I have copied Mike on this mail, but as far as I can see this is a
problem caused by either DBD-ODBC or OpenLink.
The latest version of Radiator is 3.5, which is the version you should
be using if you are upgrading, as I think there is an SQL fix to
prevent this sort of loop
Hello Mushtaque ,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:00 pm, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Hello Mushtaque -
>
> I have copied Mike on this mail, but as far as I can see this is a
> problem caused by either DBD-ODBC or OpenLink.
I agreee: I think the forst step is to upgrade to the altest version of
Radiator, and al
Title: RE: (RADIATOR) radiator stops ...
I'd suggest dumping openlink as well; it's overpriced and the windows side (last time I had to suffer it) was far from production-grade reliability. If you're trying to connect to an MS SQL Server from *n?x, I've found FreeTDS (www.freetds.org) to be fa
Matthew Trout wrote:
> I'd suggest dumping openlink as well; it's overpriced and the windows side
> (last time I had to suffer it) was far from production-grade reliability. If
> you're trying to connect to an MS SQL Server from *n?x, I've found FreeTDS
> (www.freetds.org) to be far superior, and a
Hi,
Any comments? ... I have the same issue.
Rgds.
Toomas Kärner
- Original Message -
From: "Claudio Lapidus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 12:01 AM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Retrieving a hook by filename from inside ClientListSQL
> Hello,
>
> I
Hello,
I need to
authenticate users from different databases without using a realm, or anything
else that could differenciate when a user exists in two databases... So I use
three AuthBy sentences for authentication expecting that a user
will authenticate if his pair username/password ma
I have a newsgroup server that I have told to authenticate with the same
realm as my dial in customers. I created special client for this server
and then put in an identifier. I thought it would then go to the handler I
created to just authenticate only. No accounting or sessions. I'm finding
that
You
could return a value in the Class attribute during the AuthBy and then have a
Handler use that value to do the Accounting. Something like
this:
# Authentications
Identifier auth1
AddToReply
Class="auth1"
Identifier auth2
AddToReply
Class="auth2"
Identif
I hit the send button on the first message too soon, try something like
this-
# Authentications
Identifier auth1
AddToReply Class="auth1"
Identifier auth2
AddToReply Class="auth2"
Identifier auth3
AddToReply Class="auth2"
# Accounting
Identifier acct1
Hello Jose -
Thanks for the information.
My understanding is that Acct-Input-Octets is the number of octets
received by the NAS from the client PC, and that Acct-Output-Octets is
the number of octets sent by the NAS to the client PC. I would suggest
you set up a test bed and do some experimen
Hello Frank, Hello Oscar -
Frank is quite correct (again) - this is the way I would deal with the
problem too.
Thanks Frank.
:-)
regards
Hugh
On Friday, Jan 31, 2003, at 05:03 Australia/Melbourne, Frank Danielson
wrote:
I hit the send button on the first message too soon, try something l
Hello Tom -
You should not mix Realms and Handlers in the same configuration file
for exactly this reason - Realms are always evaluated first.
Change your Realms to Handlers like this:
.
becomes
.
Note that Handlers are evaluated in the order they appear in the
configuration
Hello Claudio and Toomas,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:27 am, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Mikey -
>
> Could you answer this please?
>
> ta
>
> Hugh
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Toomas Kärner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri Jan 31, 2003 02:36:44 Australia/Melbourne
> > To: "Claudio Lapidus" <[EMAI
I tried this and I think it will work, but I have to figure out a way to
get the default domain in there. Is there an easier way than to put in an
identifier for every client and then a handler at the end of my domains to
catch all the ones without domains?
Thanks again.
Tom Swenson - CTO
NetConX
Hello Toomas, Hello Claudio -
I have been thinking about this a bit more, and there are alternative
approaches that you could consider.
The first would be a StartupHook that compiles code with multiple entry
points and then patches those entry points into the Client structures
that have been
Hello Tom -
I don't quite understand your question sorry.
Could you give me a bit more detail please?
If you want usernames without realms to be treated the same way as
those with realms, you can add a DefaultRealm parameter to your Client
clauses:
# define Client clauses
.
DefaultRe
16 matches
Mail list logo
