-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from
["radiator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:24:09 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 01:24:09 2002
Received: from karter
Hello Andrew -
Thanks for your comment. Connectivity to MS-SQL is becoming rather painful,
as MS has dropped support for Sybase interoperation. There is also a problem
with Freetds if you require more than one connection to the database.
In general, the easiest methods these days seem to be t
Hello -
I think you will need to check with Cisco ( or look at the Cisco web site).
Does anyone else on the list happen to know the answer?
cheers
Hugh
>
> Hi! This may not be a radiator specific question but just want to know what
> are the possible reasons of 'Port-Error' and 'Host-Reques
I need guidelines on Password encryption. We are running SQL Server based
customer system on Windows 2000. We desire to encrypt the password on the
SQL platform to ensure that our Customer database is not hijacked. Going
through your manual, there is ONLY a reference to Unix encrypted password
I´m evaluating the radiotor and I'm thinking to migrate from x-Tacacs
based on an Informix-DB to the Radiator based on LINUX/MySQL or
LINUX/Informix.
We are an ISP with about 10.000 Customers in the Dial-Up-Sector.
As NAS we exclusively use Cisco-Equipment (some 3660, AS5300 and two AS5200
; the
I am having problems authenticating with Radiator. I am running NT 4 with MySQL as
the database. My config script is set to first check the NT user database and then
the SQL database. When I use radpwtst I get a bad authenticator reply and then 2 no
reply's which I assume are because the fir
Hello everyone,
We had a strange occurrence on Dec 29 in which user "auser" was
continually authenticated from 11:22:17 AM up until 11:35:55 AM when we
had to stop the radiusd process. Radiator basically went into a loop and
the only way out of it was to stop/start radius. Accounting start
record
Hugh
We have had some confusion regarding issuing dynamic ip's when using
AuthbyRADIUS in a proxy situation. We understand that once an
AuthbyRADIUS clause is processed, it returns immediatly to the nas
without waiting for a reply from the proxy server. In order to issue a
dynamic ip in this si
Hello William -
I can't recall seeing this sort of problem before.
I will need to see a trace 4 debug together with a copy of your configuration
file (no secrets) to be able to say any more.
BTW - the latest version of Radiator is 2.19.
regards
Hugh
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:17, William Herna
Hello Alexander -
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:09, Alexander Wallnöfer wrote:
> I´m evaluating the radiotor and I'm thinking to migrate from x-Tacacs
> based on an Informix-DB to the Radiator based on LINUX/MySQL or
> LINUX/Informix.
> We are an ISP with about 10.000 Customers in the Dial-Up-Sector.
>
Hello Eric -
It looks to me like the shared secrets are not correct.
radpwtst uses the shared secret "mysecret" by default, so in your case you
should use "radpwtst -secret dogcat .".
regards
Hugh
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 03:34, Eric Johnson wrote:
> I am having problems authenticating with
At 03:17 PM 1/7/2002 -0800, Matt Scifo wrote:
>The
>attached debug file (replyhook_example.log) shows that as soon as
>AuthbyRADIUS sends the Access-Request to the proxy server, an
>Access-Accept is sent back to our nas containing no attributes, even
>with the ReplyHook. The nas then authenticate
At 03:17 PM 1/7/2002 -0800, Matt Scifo wrote:
>Our setup includes well
>over a 100 handlers which are used based on called-station-id and/or
>realm.
There is an SQL based module that would eliminate these 100 handlers. Look
for AuthSQLRadius.
Steve
---
Stephen Roderick
Universal Telecom, Inc.
Hello Matt, Hello Steve -
Thanks for sending the files.
The problem you have with the two Access-Accepts is because you have
specified "NoForwardAuthentication" in the second AuthBy RADIUS clause. This
will cause this AuthBy to always Accept any authentication request. This is
not what you n
Hi genius,
I am using to authenticate users. However, I would like to
verifiy the user's username, password and status=T. So, How, can I
rewrite the statement in sq.cfg to make it works.
Thanks so much for paying attention.
---
Regards,
Sam Cheung
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Archive at htt
Hello Sam -
Just specify a suitable AuthSelect:
AuthSelect select PASSWORD where USERNAME = '%n' and STATUS = 'T'
AuthColumnDef 0, User-Password, check
regards
Hugh
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:09, Sam Cheung wrote:
> Hi genius,
>
> I am using to authenticate users. However, I wou
Hi,
This has been discussed on the list before, but I cannot seem to find a
resolution ;)
One of our clients has Radiator 2.18 with Radmin 1.5 running on Debian
Linux 2.2, using PM3 NAS's.
Denying Simultaneous use has never worked when clients connect with
multilink ISDN connections - I now se
Hello Michael -
The SNMP query is not run for every access request - it is only run if there
is a session limit exceeded according to the session database. The problem
with simultaneous use checking is that in many cases the information received
from the NAS in the radius accounting requests
18 matches
Mail list logo