RE: (RADIATOR) Controlling session: DBM file

2001-04-24 Thread Kitabjian, Dave
I'm not an expert, but based on my experience I don't think checking the DBM is your problem. I'm more inclined to think that, after it checks the DBM, it's doing an snmpget and that's what's taking the time. Do you have a NasType specified in any of your clauses? Also, after you see the delay,

(RADIATOR) DefaultReply and AddToReply

2001-04-24 Thread Pascal Robert
Hi, I'm working with a demo with Radiator and I have a "small" problem. One of our wholesalers want some more attributes in the reply. So I used AddToReply to add them to the Accept-Request answer, but I also need to send some generic attributes if the request has failed (bad username or passwo

RE: (RADIATOR) DefaultReply and AddToReply

2001-04-24 Thread Kitabjian, Dave
Try: ... AuthBy CATCHALL_REJECT RejectHasReason # Identifier CATCHALL_REJECT Filename %D/users.reject # In users.reject: DEFAULT Auth-Type = "Reject:Your Username is c

Re: (RADIATOR) snmpget fro TotalControlSNMP

2001-04-24 Thread Janet N del Mundo
Did anyone ever get the MIB mentioned in this particular article? I'm getting the same error messages for snmpget (TotalControlSNMP). The STDERR output was Error in packet Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB. This name doesn't exist: enterprises.429.4.2.1.140.1.2.8.51

Re: (RADIATOR) Controlling session: DBM file

2001-04-24 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Hugo - I will need to see the complete configuration file and a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening. thanks Hugh At 23:00 -0300 01/4/23, Hugo Dias wrote: >Hugh, > > I am trying to use MaxSession and SessionDatabase together but the >radiator seens to be very low

(RADIATOR) Ascend-Multicast-Client

2001-04-24 Thread John Coy
Greetings all! It's been a long time since I've posted to this list -- probably a good sign because my RADIUS server has been authenticating nicely for several years now. I'm preparing to upgrade from 2.13 to 2.18 which is exciting, and a testimony to the rock-solid software these guys at Open S

Re: (RADIATOR) DefaultReply and AddToReply

2001-04-24 Thread Hugh Irvine
Salut Pascal - I think I need a bit more detail - do you want to add attributes to Access-Accept messages, or to Access-Reject messages? Or both? I must confess I don't understand your example below. thanks Hugh At 9:16 -0400 01/4/24, Pascal Robert wrote: >Hi, > >I'm working with a demo wi

(RADIATOR) Ascend-Multicast-Client

2001-04-24 Thread Mike McCauley
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:42:06 +1000 (EST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [John Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >From mikem Wed Apr 25 12:41:59 2001 Received: by oscar.open.com.a

Re: (RADIATOR) Ascend-Multicast-Client

2001-04-24 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello John - Thanks for your positive comments - I hope you are telling everyone you know to buy and use Radiator! :-) In answer to your question, you should *not* use CVX attributes on your Ascend gear - they will not work. The real answer to your question depends on whether you are runnin

Re: (RADIATOR) Ascend-Multicast-Client

2001-04-24 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi John - BTW - please make sure you pick up all the patches for Radiator 2.18, as there have been quite a few fixes posted. cheers Hugh At 22:36 -0500 01/4/24, John Coy wrote: >Greetings all! > >It's been a long time since I've posted to this list -- probably >a good sign because my RADIUS

Re: (RADIATOR) snmpget fro TotalControlSNMP

2001-04-24 Thread Alexey A. Shavaldin
Hello ! On Wednesday 25 April 2001 06:13 am, you wrote: > Did anyone ever get the MIB mentioned in this particular article? I'm > getting the same error messages for snmpget (TotalControlSNMP). My Nas.pm modification: Find subfunction isOnlineTotalControlSNMP in Nas.pm. Try to replace the cor

Re: (RADIATOR) snmpget fro TotalControlSNMP

2001-04-24 Thread Janet N del Mundo
This looks like the old code from version 2.15... That version worked fine with me too. I guess I'll change the subfunction back to 2.15. Thank you! Janet "Alexey A. Shavaldin" wrote: > > Hello ! > > On Wednesday 25 April 2001 06:13 am, you wrote: > > Did anyone ever get the MIB mentioned in