I believe there is a severe memory leak in Radiator 2.16.3. The
server is configured as a Proxy-Radius only (10 Realms only), no
DB_File, no LDAP.
Radiusd grows to over 50 MB in around 12 hours. The same configuration
on a 2.15 running since July is only 25 MB in size.
--
Christophe Wolfhugel
Hi there!
> Could you please try running the above query by hand from the command line to
> verify that it is working, and if it is please send me the output.
Yes, running it from command line give the same error.
Cheers!
*
Sajari Bin Sarka
Hello Aaron -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using a MwSQL DB to authenticate and log accounting requests. I would
> like to only get starts and stops and no alives because they clutter up my
> DB. How can I configure that?? I currently have one realm for DEFAULT and
> a
At 10:11 26/09/00 +1100, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>I must apologise to you, as it does appear that there is a problem with
>radacct.cgi and SQL databases in secure mode. I am very sorry that you have
>spent a rather frustrating time trying to make this work.
No problem, that was part of discovering Rad
Hello Andrew -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:17 PM
> > To: Andrew Pollock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator proxying and NAT
> >
> >
> >
> >
Hello Ron -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Ron Hensley wrote:
> Ive had a strange occurance today on one of my radius servers.
> It just stops responding though its still running after being up no more
> then
> 5 minutes. Stopped/Started many times, a few times with trace level 4 for
> heavy debug info.
>
Hello SaJaRi -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, SaJaRi wrote:
> Hi there!
>
>
> > Could you please try running the above query by hand from the command line to
> > verify that it is working, and if it is please send me the output.
>
> Yes, running it from command line give the same error.
>
In that cas
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 6:39 PM
> To: Andrew Pollock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Radiator proxying and NAT
>
>
>
> Hello Andrew -
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > -Origi
Hello Christophe -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Christophe Wolfhugel wrote:
> I believe there is a severe memory leak in Radiator 2.16.3. The
> server is configured as a Proxy-Radius only (10 Realms only), no
> DB_File, no LDAP.
>
> Radiusd grows to over 50 MB in around 12 hours. The same configuration
The subject is my question:
how many realms and/or handles can i use?
thank you
Jesus M Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telia Iberia, S.A.
Planificación y Diseño de Red
Tfno: +34 91 623 2909
Fax: +34 91 623 2950
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
Has anyone ever gotten Radiator to work with Infranet in leu of their
pathetic Radius server?
If so, did you write your own AuthBy module for Infranet? Did it take a
long time?
Any replies are most appreciated... thanks!
- D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiat
Hugh,
Think i keyed onto the problem already, so im goign to hold off.
The one change that has been made was to start limited simultaneous
usage, with DBM and with BayFinger as the NasTYPE.
I believe the fingers were backing up, or slow to respond and were the
culprit.
After switching to Bay, (
Have you considered a diffrent database? We run 5 radius servers off one
database with no issues.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Hensley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 7:38 AM
To: Hugh Irvine
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Stop Responding
Hugh,
Have the Radiator folks considered using the Perl Net::SNMP module
instead of an external snmpget program? There are many advantages to
this approach; for one thing, you don't have to run an external program
as Net::SNMP is written fully in Perl. That improves performance by
eliminating a fork,
Hi,
howto to log the auth failure or auth accepted into a logfile
or syslog ? And howto log a line for each ACCT packet received ?
Any help would be appreciated.
TIA,
http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, em
Yes, but then you wouldnt control simultaneous use.
If user a makes one call on a NAS using one radius server
and it logs it to its local database, then the same
user dials into a second NAS which uses a different Radius server
, which cant see the first ones database, then, it has no way to tell
Hello Jesús -
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Jesús M Díaz wrote:
> The subject is my question:
>
> how many realms and/or handles can i use?
>
There is no limit in Radiator on the number of Realms or Handlers that you can
use. However there are some considerations to keep in mind.
Realms are stored i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of David Lloyd
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Radiator and Infranet
>
>
> Has anyone ever gotten Radiator to work with Infranet in leu of their
>
Hello Carlos -
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Carlos Canau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> howto to log the auth failure or auth accepted into a logfile
> or syslog ? And howto log a line for each ACCT packet received ?
>
At the moment your only option is to use the Trace option in the configuration
file, and
Hello Ron -
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ron Hensley wrote:
> Hugh,
>
> Think i keyed onto the problem already, so im goign to hold off.
> The one change that has been made was to start limited simultaneous
> usage, with DBM and with BayFinger as the NasTYPE.
>
> I believe the fingers were backing up,
Hello Andrew -
> >
> > Your description is most curious, as Radiator opens a socket and
> > then keeps
> > using it forever. How are you starting radiusd? And what hardware/software
> > platform are you running on?
> >
> > In any case, it sounds like you should fix the firewall.
>
> Hi Hugh,
>
Hello David -
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Lloyd wrote:
> Have the Radiator folks considered using the Perl Net::SNMP module
> instead of an external snmpget program? There are many advantages to
> this approach; for one thing, you don't have to run an external program
> as Net::SNMP is written f
Hi there!
> In that case, the problem is not with Radiator, but with snmpget. It may also
> be the case that the NAS does not have SNMP configured, or that the community
> string is incorrect. You will need to make sure that snmpget is working
> properly before Radiator can use it.
The snmp on
Hello SaJaRi -
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, SaJaRi wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> > In that case, the problem is not with Radiator, but with snmpget. It may also
> > be the case that the NAS does not have SNMP configured, or that the community
> > string is incorrect. You will need to make sure that snmpget is
hmmm... will there be any AuthBy Portal or sumthin in the future?
i don't wish to give up Radiator in place of their TSM so i end up
forwarding just the accounting packets to their TSM for the moment. i'm
trying so hard to keep both database in sync, which is temporary until i
get the Portal g
You must have a more complicated configuration requirement than us. We're
able to proxy everything (authentication and accounting) through to TSM.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Darwin A. Bawasanta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL
ok, CalledStationId clause seems to be ok for me, but, can i mix with
realms? so, for a sub-set of my realms, i need to check the
called-station-id, but, if the realm is not from than subset, it must
be manneged by a realm clause.
my questio is, can i configure some realms clauses and, after them
Not really, aside from the standard authentication scheme, our
Authentication requirements includes:
1. Caller-Id blocking
2. Roaming Restriction on 7 POPs (can be combination of any or all
including GRIC's)
3. Dedicated-Dialup (dynamic Check and Reply items) which i don't know
why Portal can't
28 matches
Mail list logo
