(RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator in request from DEFAULT

2000-05-16 Thread Asif Rumani
Hello,   I have 2 USR NetServers with 16 modem ports each. One out of the two works fine, authentication and accounting are done flawlessly. But the other produces the following error message during accounting-requests.   Bad authenticator in request from DEFAULT   Any help on the above woul

(RADIATOR) Out of swap space

2000-05-16 Thread Beth Morgan
Hi - I've been struggling with a SQL timeout problem for quite a while now. I checked the FAQs, and don't have the signs of a memory leak. It looks like it's swap space! (See below) When this happens, processes remain running, but radiator can't access the MySQL database. I have to reboot to

(RADIATOR) Duplicate Request ID

2000-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Chris - > > Tue May 16 12:48:02 2000: INFO: Duplicate request id 137 received > from : ignored > > This is the error message I get. All I've done is take a PM3 that is > pointing to a Radiator 2.14.1 server and repointing it to a 2.15 > server. No other changes. The 2.15 server see

(RADIATOR) Duplicate Request ID

2000-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello - Tue May 16 12:48:02 2000: INFO: Duplicate request id 137 received from : ignored This is the error message I get. All I've done is take a PM3 that is pointing to a Radiator 2.14.1 server and repointing it to a 2.15 server. No other changes. The 2.15 server seems to work fine with

Re: (RADIATOR) Bad Authenticator in request from DEFAULT

2000-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Asif - On Wed, 17 May 2000, Asif Rumani wrote: > > Hello, > > I have 2 USR NetServers with 16 modem ports each. One out of the two works fine, authentication and accounting are done flawlessly. But the other produces the following error message during accounting-requests. > > Bad authe

Re: (RADIATOR) Out of swap space

2000-05-16 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Beth - On Wed, 17 May 2000, Beth Morgan wrote: > Hi - > > I've been struggling with a SQL timeout problem for quite a while now. > I checked the FAQs, and don't have the signs of a memory leak. It looks > like it's swap space! (See below) When this happens, processes remain > running, bu