You have to use virtual profiles in the AS5300.
Usually, you do this by entering the following config
aaa authentication ppp default radius
aaa authorization network default radius
aaa accounting network start-stop radius
virtual-profile aaa
virtual-profile virtual-template 1
!
interface virtual-
Hello Aaron -
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Aaron Liu wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
>
> >
> > You should try using AuthBy LDAP2 and the corresponding Net::LDAP module.
> > Please have a look at section 6.30 in the Radiator 2.14.1 reference manual
> for
> > a discussion of the various LDAP options.
> >
> > Could you
Hello Lakmin -
This is what your email looks like (see below). Please send your configuration
file as an attachment so I can read it and help you.
thanks
Hugh
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, S.K.D. Lakmin Premnath wrote:
> hi hugh
>
> I'm connecting MSSQL fron BSDI box to authentication and accounting
Hello Dan -
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Daniel Senie wrote:
> Hugh Irvine wrote:
> >
> > Hello Dan -
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Daniel Senie wrote:
> > > I have the following in my radius.cfg:
> > >
> > >
> > > Facility local1
> > > Trace 4
> > >
> > >
> > > Nothing gets logged.
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I see. Unfortunately, I don't see any way that you can avoid the
> two Accounting-Accept's. I've copied Mike on this so he can offer
> his opinion, but it looks to me like this is the way it is.
Hi Hugh,
So what should happen if we had the Acct Ra
hi hugh
sorry about previous mail in HTML format. I have attached text file with
this mail.
pls see it and let me know
lakmin
hi hugh
I'm connecting MSSQL fron BSDI box to authentication and accounting from SQL database.
Here I need to run a stored procedure (say this procedure update CHECKAT
Well, it was a good try...
However, the -r has been on all along to allow logging the syslog output
of the MAX6000. Since I work with RedHat a lot (and with routers or
other devices near it) I was well aware of the -r switch.
I also use ipchains (ip firewall filtering) in the server. I do permit
Hi all,
I think this questions is just very answered, but I need some information.
Actually I have a NT 4.0 SP5 with Radiator 2.14.1 ( with patches 2.14.1)
running properly, but I autherticate with a flat file. because of I have
many users I need another way to do that, and I think MS SQL could
Hi,
some of our access servers are sending Status-Server requests to
our radiator servers. Radiator cant send the reply back to the NAS because
the resulting packet is too large, (because of a lot of clients configured)
so it logs a 'ERR: sendTo: send failed: Message too long'. Those
Hello Arturo -
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Arturo Pina wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > I see. Unfortunately, I don't see any way that you can avoid the
> > two Accounting-Accept's. I've copied Mike on this so he can offer
> > his opinion, but it looks to me like this is
Hello Lakmin -
Thanks for sending the file - much better!
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, S.K.D. Lakmin Premnath wrote:
I'm connecting MSSQL fron BSDI box to authentication and accounting from SQL
database. Here I need to run a stored procedure (say this procedure update
CHECKATTR column from SUBSCRIBER
Hello Alejandro -
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Alejandro Dau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some of our access servers are sending Status-Server requests to
> our radiator servers. Radiator cant send the reply back to the NAS because
> the resulting packet is too large, (because of a lot of clients confi
Hello Fernando -
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Fernando Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think this questions is just very answered, but I need some information.
>
> Actually I have a NT 4.0 SP5 with Radiator 2.14.1 ( with patches 2.14.1)
> running properly, but I autherticate with a flat file. because of
On Jan 19, 10:13am, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Authentication over MS SQL 7.0
>
> Hello Fernando -
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Fernando Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think this questions is just very answered, but I need some information.
> >
> > Actually I have a NT 4.0 SP5 w
Hi,
I am still experiencing a dilema with a check item problem (which is not
the check item itself as you will see from the Debug output) What is
happening is that the user "foobar" is being rejected due to a Caller-ID
failure (which is what we want) and then being accepted by the DEFAULT
option
Hello Steve.
Thanks for that. We have included a copy of that dictionary in the next
release.
Cheers.
On Jan 14, 10:56am, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) 3Com VSA's
> Hello-
>
> I posted to the USR Mailing list to see if I could locate the VSA's for
> 3Com gear. I'm still getting s
To all,
If anyone is looking into the problem regarding the our Check Item failure
then please ignore it. After much persistence and loss of hair, I have
worked it out.
It was actually very simple now I look at it.
Here is the modification to our radius.cfg file.
- SNIP -
Hi Again,
Ummm, there seems to be a major bug in what I have done with this:
AuthByPolicy ContinueUntilIgnore
AcceptIfMissing
Filename /usr/local/etc/raddb/users
Identifier System
Filename /etc/master.passwd
Hello everyone -
I have recently been investigating a problem on a customer site where a
portmaster4 does not enforce Simultaneous-Use checking properly, either with
NasType TotalControl (using pmwho) or with NasType TotalControlSNMP.
Upon comparing Accounting-Request packets and pmwho output (
19 matches
Mail list logo
