Hi Steffen,
Thanks for the patch. It is now in the latest patch set.
Cheers.
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 07:29:51 am Steffen Weinreich wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have found one of my Feilian c200 Token which has been drifted into
> the future. At the moment its is about 40 sec in the future and
> th
Hi Hugh,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:21 am, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Hello Nathan -
>
> I will need to see a copy of the configuration file (no secrets)
> together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening.
>
> I suspect the configuration is not set up to check the time properly.
Maybe the timezone o
ED] 'Great managers meet deadlines and make money.
Great leaders meet the challenge and make history.'
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nathan 'Franko' Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 200
PROTECTED]>
> To: "Nathan 'Franko' Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:45 AM
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time Restriction
>
>
> >
> > Hello Nathan -
> >
> > Thanks for the configuration and the tr
INFO: Access rejected for day1501: Time: not
> within an
> allowable Time range
> Wed Jan 7 10:22:59 2004: DEBUG: do query is: 'INSERT into RadLogs
> (Username,Dat
> a,NASIdentifier,NASport,CallerID) values
> ('day1501','password','203.63.154.1',
Hello Nathan -
I will need to see a copy of the configuration file (no secrets)
together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening.
I suspect the configuration is not set up to check the time properly.
regards
Hugh
On 07/01/2004, at 8:45 AM, Nathan 'Franko' Franklin wrote:
Hello List,
you're right.
Ir worked after i changed to_date to to_timestamp.
Thanks Hugh !!!
You're good ,mann !!
Warmest regards
ddn
From: Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "deden purnamahadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) ti
Hello Deden -
I am not familiar with PostgreSQL, but it looks like the "to_date"
fuction is not correctly interpreting the parameters that are being
passed to it.
You should check the "to_date" documentation.
My guess is that you should remove the colons ":" from between %H:%M:%S
as shown
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:07 pm, Mike McCauley wrote:
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from
> [Michael Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:11 pm
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
Ayotunde Itayemi wrote:
Hi Hugh, Hi all,
Please I need to implement a configuration that involves the following:
1. pre-paid service users (sayd a payment for 100hours for example)
2. regular dial-in users with no time limitatation
What would be the best approach to this?
Two subscriber ta
5-105-5160
%-Original Message-
%From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
%Sent: Jueves, 16 de Enero de 2003 04:19 p.m.
%To: Anton Krall
%Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item
%
%
%
%Hello Anton -
%
%I would suggest you do something like this:
%
%
%# define A
e-
%From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
%Sent: Jueves, 16 de Enero de 2003 01:27 a.m.
%To: Anton Krall
%Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item
%
%
%
%Hello Anton -
%
%As mentioned previously, the answer depends on what else you are doing
%in your configuration file a
on Krall
%Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item
%
%
%
%Hello Anton -
%
%As mentioned previously, the answer depends on what else you are doing
%in your configuration file and how you are going to recognise and
%process the radius requests. You can use Handlers or cascaded
?
__
Anton Krall
CEO
%-Original Message-
%From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
%Sent: Jueves, 16 de Enero de 2003 12:09 a.m.
%To: Anton Krall
%Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item
Hugh Irvine
%Sent: Jueves, 16 de Enero de 2003 12:09 a.m.
%To: Anton Krall
%Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item
%
%
%
%Hello Anton -
%
%A check item usually goes in a user record.
%
%Ie:
%
%someuser Password = xxx, Time = "Wk-0800"
% ..
%
%There
Hello Anton -
A check item usually goes in a user record.
Ie:
someuser Password = xxx, Time = "Wk-0800"
..
There are other possibilities depending on what else you are doing in
your configuration file.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, Jan 16, 2003, at 16:19 Australia/Melbourne, Ant
Hello Greg -
You are correct - if you lose a stop, you lose everything if your
billing is based on stops only.
Obviously, a system that takes into account "Alives" will be more
accurate.
The other difference to check is the difference between the start and
stop timestamps, and the time indic
Hello Chuck -
Yes - you should use the "Time = " check item.
Have a look at section 13.1.13 in the Radiator 3.3 reference manual.
("doc/ref.html").
regards
Hugh
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 05:41 AM, Chuck Sine wrote:
> Is there a way to restrict specific user logins by time of d
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Cristóbal Talavera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:26 AM
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time Check Item
.tiscali.es/conexion
-
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cristóbal Talavera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time Check Item format.
>
> Hello Cristóbal -
>
Hello Cristóbal -
I don't quite understand your question, sorry.
What exactly do you want to have happen?
regards
Hugh
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 07:39, Cristóbal Talavera wrote:
> > Hi Griff,
> >
> > Use:
> > Time="Wk1000-1800,SaSu-2400"
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tunde Itayemi.
> >
> > - Origin
> Hi Griff,
>
> Use:
> Time="Wk1000-1800,SaSu-2400"
>
> Regards,
> Tunde Itayemi.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Griff Hamlin, III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:41 PM
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Time Check Item format.
>
>
> > Hello all
Hi Griff,
Use:
Time="Wk1000-1800,SaSu-2400"
Regards,
Tunde Itayemi.
- Original Message -
From: "Griff Hamlin, III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:41 PM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Time Check Item format.
> Hello all,
>
> If I wanted the time
Hello Ray -
Please send me a copy of the configuration that works in Radiator 2.19 and
doesn't work with Radiator 3.0. Also include a trace 4 debug from both
versions of Radiator showing what happens.
thanks and regards
Hugh
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hello Samuel -
Radiator itself has no notion of "holidays", however you should be able to do
something fairly simple in a hook.
Have a look at the example hooks in the file "goodies/hooks.txt".
regards
Hugh
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 22:07, Samuel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to find out a way of all
t; From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:52 PM
> > To: Leon Oosterwijk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Leon Oosterwijk
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time of day login
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Leon -
> >
&
rom: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:52 PM
> To: Leon Oosterwijk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Leon Oosterwijk
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time of day login
>
>
>
> Hello Leon -
>
> The more usual case is to specify a num
siontimeouts to the NAS, or would it deny access?
>
> Leon
>
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:29 PM
> > Aan: Leon Oosterwijk; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Onderwerp: Re: (
11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g1Q3csx21386
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:38:54 -0600
From: "Leon Oosterwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Time of day login
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:38:48 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAI
jk
> ISDN-NET Inc.
> www.isdn.net
> +1 615-221-4200
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 11:56 PM
> > To: Barry Andersson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time of day login
> &
sson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time of day login
>
>
>
> Hello Barry -
>
> You would use a Session-Timout = "until Time" reply attribute.
>
> See sections 13.1.13 and 13.2.8 in the Radiator reference manual
> ("doc/ref.html&qu
Hello Barry -
You would use a Session-Timout = "until Time" reply attribute.
See sections 13.1.13 and 13.2.8 in the Radiator reference manual
("doc/ref.html").
regards
Hugh
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:30, Barry Andersson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if we restrict login by time of day in the
Hello Tunde -
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:32, Tunde Itayemi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just joined the list and I am trying out Radiator.
> I would like to know/have help on implementing a time-of-day based
> authentication scheme.
> I work for an ISP that offers 4 services:
> 1. Rushour - full 24-7 int
Title: Re: (RADIATOR) Time of Day
Access
Hello Chairarth -
At 8:30 AM +0700 6/21/01, chairarth wrote:
Hi
all,
By now we
implement Radiator and Radmin on Windows NT . So is it possible to
set time of day
access for some users (e.g. user A can
login only on Saterday and Sunday , user B can
Hello Michael -
Many thanks for posting this code. Would you be agreeable to us
including it in the Radiator distribution?
regards
Hugh
At 12:03 -0400 16/5/01, Michael Audet wrote:
>I attached some code I wrote a few months back.
>I combined the AuthbyADSI with the AuthbySQL code to produce
I attached some code I wrote a few months back.
I combined the AuthbyADSI with the AuthbySQL code to produce a
authentication method that authenticates a user via Windows 2000 ADSI and
then tracks their monthly time via SQL.
For example: I have a 800# that users call into and I want to restrict
Hello Mariano -
You will need to write a Hook to do at least some of what you
describe, and do some experiments to answer your own questions.
I am on the road this week and can't do any tests until next week, so
I suggest you try a few things yourself and let me know if you have
any trouble.
Hello Asif -
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 23:19, Asif Ahmed wrote:
> We are using Radiator with authentication from SQL(Plat), we wanna
> implement charging on timings i.e. rates for morning usage is double the
> rates for usage in nights. Any idea will be appreciated.
>
I would suggest that you p
Hello Edgar -
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Edgar R Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
>
> I included a field in my MySQL table which indicates the time when a client
> is only allowed access.
> What is the value of my Time Field so that I can tell radiator that a client
> is allowed to login
> DAILY but only
Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dean Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time =
>
> Hello Dean -
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > In my /etc/ra
Hello Blake -
On Fri, 03 Nov 2000, Blake Golliher wrote:
>
> What the default timing for the accounting records? Is it GMT?
>
Its the local time that is set on your Radiator host.
regards
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy,
Hello -
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, cistron wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> We want to allow a group of users to log only from say 10:00 to 18:00
> hours. If a user belonging to this group is logged at 18:00 hours he
> should be disconnected. How can we do it in Radiator.
>
You would specify the users like
Hello Dean -
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
>
> I only want to measure it as a daily rate rather than a monthly or
> longer.
>
> I don't see how I can do what you suggest and allow the user
> back on the next day. If he logs off at 10pm, he's allowed back on at
Hi Hugh,
I only want to measure it as a daily rate rather than a monthly or
longer.
I don't see how I can do what you suggest and allow the user
back on the next day. If he logs off at 10pm, he's allowed back on at 12am
:)
Regards
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Hugh Irv
Hello Dean -
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
>
> Yes that did indeed work. Now we have another step tpo that
> scenario. We have a collection of users who are only supposed to have 10
> hours per day. It doesn't matter when this block starts but its only 10
> hours.
>
Hello !
I think your "Time = " statement is correct but a comma (,) is missing
in the previous line.
SUTO Janos
GTS-Datanet
Tel: +36-1-4524458
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote:
>
> Hi Guys
>
> In my /etc/raddb/users file I have this:
>
> timer User-Password = "xx
Hi Hugh,
Yes that did indeed work. Now we have another step tpo that
scenario. We have a collection of users who are only supposed to have 10
hours per day. It doesn't matter when this block starts but its only 10
hours.
I understand Session-Timeout = 36000 will limit to
Hello Dean -
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> In my /etc/raddb/users file I have this:
>
> timer User-Password = "xx"
> Service-Type = Framed-User
> Framed-Protocol = PPP,
> Framed-Routing = None,
> Framed-MTU = 1500,
> F
Hello Matt -
On Wed, 05 Jan 2000, Matt Chambers wrote:
> Hello.
>
> For some reason my accounting logs report the wrong time. The radius
> server has the right time...and as far as I know, Livingston Portmasters
> don't have a clock...at least, I could not find any commands having to
> do with
Bulcao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX
>
> On Jun 7, 9:03pm, Jose Roberto Bulcao wrote:
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX
> >
>
On Jun 7, 9:03pm, Jose Roberto Bulcao wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> It seems the the specific clause is working ok, but the auth packet is
> being catched by the last DEFAULT clause. Here you are (debug level 4):
Yes, its clea
Framed-Routing = None
Framed-MTU = 1500
Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 08:53:24 -0500
> From: Mike McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jose Roberto Bulcao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [E
Hello Jose,
I have just tested your configuration and Time check item. Your configuration
and users file looks fine, and it worked OK for me, allowing access only
betweeen the times given.
Can you send your log file, showing what happens when it should be applying the
Time restriction?
Cheers.
Hi Paul,
On Mar 25, 11:14am, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Time Options
> Howdy,
>
> I have been working hard to get radiator up and running the past couple of
> days in conjuntion with a Time Watcher program and have succeeded in doing
> so with little stress. Thanks to all those th
54 matches
Mail list logo