--On Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:55:45 PM +1000 Hugh Irvine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jerome -
I think the correct answer would be to have different processing for
"Timestamp" and "Event-Timestamp", not to override what is currently done
by Radiator with "Timestamp", given that they ar
Hello Jerome -
I think the correct answer would be to have different processing for
"Timestamp" and "Event-Timestamp", not to override what is currently
done by Radiator with "Timestamp", given that they are different ideas
of what "time" is.
In any case, if "Event-Timestamp" is present in a
--On Thursday, October 24, 2002 04:11:44 PM +1000 Hugh Irvine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mike -
I don't agree with changing Radiator's Timestamp.
If there is an Event-Timestamp in a request and someone wants to use it,
it is simple enough to use special characters (%{Event-Timestamp}),
and/
Hi Mike -
I don't agree with changing Radiator's Timestamp.
If there is an Event-Timestamp in a request and someone wants to use
it, it is simple enough to use special characters (%{Event-Timestamp}),
and/or write a hook to make whatever changes are wanted/needed on a
local basis.
cheers
Hu
