Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id: ignored

2002-07-03 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Angel - The port from which the reply is sent back is the same as the request was received on, which is specified by the AuthPort/AcctPort parameters (UDP 1645/1646 by default). regards Hugh On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:52, Angel Bustos wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > Very clear your point. > Just to

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id: ignored

2002-07-02 Thread Angel Bustos
Hi Hugh, Very clear your point. Just to begin a good search of this issue: do I begin searching for any specific port for the Radiator "sent-back" accounting response? I believe that I'll begin by disabling Redhat 7.2 default ipchains firewalling rules and I'd know the port or ports range that

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id: ignored

2002-06-27 Thread Angel Bustos
Hi Hugh, Dave et al, I'm receiving just accounting forward from a customer for further processing, and I've noticed the same problem; a lot of retransmissions (connectivity with our customer is really good however); I've followed your advice and i've set explicitly DupInterval to 2 seconds in o

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id: ignored

2002-06-27 Thread Angel Bustos
Hi Hugh, Dave et al, I'm receiving just accounting forward from a customer for further processing, and I've noticed the same problem; a lot of retransmissions (connectivity with our customer is really good however); I've followed your advice and i've set explicitly DupInterval to 2 seconds in ou

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id: ignored

2002-06-26 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Dave - You normally configure the timeout and retransmit values in your NAS(s) so there will only ever be a small number of retransmissions. If your NAS sends more requests than you tell it to, it is an issue that must be addressed by your supplier. BTW - the DupInterval configured in

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id

2001-10-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Griff - On Tuesday 09 October 2001 06:17, Griff Hamlin, III wrote: > Hello, > > I get a ton of these "Duplicate requet id xx received from some ip.. > ignored' in my logfile. Should I be concerned about this? Is there some > way I can make them go away? > I will need to see a copy of the

Re: (RADIATOR) Duplicate request id

2000-02-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Erik - On Wed, 09 Feb 2000, Erik Meitner wrote: > We have a USR TotalControl Chassis that still produces these messages: > > Tue Feb 8 15:05:07 2000: INFO: Duplicate request id 236 received from > 11.22.33.44: ignored > > even though IgnoreAcctSignature is in the section. Does this > m