On Wednesday 09 March 2011 09:16:50 pm Aman Arneja wrote:
> is that the patch set 4.7?
Yes.
Cheers.
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mike McCauley wrote:
> > Hello Aman,
> >
> > thanks for raising this.
> > This issue has been fixed in the latest patch set.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > On Wednesd
Got the patch, works perfectly now! .. Thanx
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Aman Arneja wrote:
> is that the patch set 4.7?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
>> Hello Aman,
>>
>> thanks for raising this.
>> This issue has been fixed in the latest patch set.
>>
>> Che
is that the patch set 4.7?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hello Aman,
>
> thanks for raising this.
> This issue has been fixed in the latest patch set.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 07:38:58 pm Aman Arneja wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > I am trying to test the ra
Hello Aman,
thanks for raising this.
This issue has been fixed in the latest patch set.
Cheers.
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 07:38:58 pm Aman Arneja wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I am trying to test the radiator server we just purchased
> and notice that if my client NAK’s the server proposed method and pr
Hi Guys
I am trying to test the radiator server we just purchased
and notice that if my client NAK’s the server proposed method and proposes a
list of methods, RADIATOR just looks at the first method in the list and
sends
EAP Failure if it is not configured for it. From the RFC my understanding is
