Re: (RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records

2000-10-05 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Daniel - The amount of code that runs in AuthBy RADIUS to forward a packet is very minimal, so forwarding times should be at most a couple of milliseconds. regards Hugh On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, daniel wrote: > Just out of curiousity, do you see any performance changes in speed when > you a

RE: (RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records

2000-10-05 Thread Andrew Pollock
Not to the point where things get unacceptable. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 1:54 PM > To: Andrew Pollock > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records &

Re: (RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records

2000-10-05 Thread daniel
Just out of curiousity, do you see any performance changes in speed when you are using radiators with AuthBy RADIUS? > Hi, > > I've got a bit of a problem with replies to accounting records, which I'm a > bit stumped over. > > Basically we implemented a new configuration recently where a Rad

Re: (RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records

2000-10-05 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Andrew - You will need to look at a trace 4 debug to see what is happening. regards Hugh On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a bit of a problem with replies to accounting records, which I'm a > bit stumped over. > > Basically we implemented a new configuratio

(RADIATOR) Replying to accounting records

2000-10-05 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I've got a bit of a problem with replies to accounting records, which I'm a bit stumped over. Basically we implemented a new configuration recently where a Radiator server receives accounting requests, and proxies them to another Radiator server and then another Radiator server (yes, three R