Re: (RADIATOR) Check Item question - "negative lookahead assertion"

2000-05-31 Thread Brian
Thanks Hugh, this worked great. Brian On Mon, 29 May 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote: > > Hello Brian - > > On Sun, 28 May 2000, Brian wrote: > > Called-Station-Id appears in my detail logs as: > > > > Called-Station-Id = "3182134600" > > > > However, doing something like this in a checkitem, pro

Re: (RADIATOR) Check Item question - "negative lookahead assertion"

2000-05-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Brian - On Sun, 28 May 2000, Brian wrote: > Called-Station-Id appears in my detail logs as: > > Called-Station-Id = "3182134600" > > However, doing something like this in a checkitem, produces an error: > > Called-Station-Id != "3182134600" > > do I have to do something like: > > Call

Re: (RADIATOR) Check Item question

2000-05-27 Thread Brian
Called-Station-Id appears in my detail logs as: Called-Station-Id = "3182134600" However, doing something like this in a checkitem, produces an error: Called-Station-Id != "3182134600" do I have to do something like: Called-Station-Id = (?!"3182134600") or are the quotes not even needed?

Re: (RADIATOR) Check Item question

2000-05-26 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Brian - On Sat, 27 May 2000, Brian wrote: > Can you do something like this in a Check Item: > > > Caller-Id != 1234567 > > Is the != valid? I want to make it so our guest account cannot dial our > 800 number. Rather than check that the Caller-ID is one of dozens of > "good" numbers, I

(RADIATOR) Check Item question

2000-05-26 Thread Brian
Can you do something like this in a Check Item: Caller-Id != 1234567 Is the != valid? I want to make it so our guest account cannot dial our 800 number. Rather than check that the Caller-ID is one of dozens of "good" numbers, I would rather check that it is not a "bad" number. Brian -