Re: [RADIATOR] Bug in default dictionary

2016-04-05 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On 5.4.2016 14.02, Eddie Stassen wrote: > The version 4.16 dictionary has an open 'BEGIN-VENDOR Freeswitch' on > line 9322. This means any ATTRIBUTE after that in the file will be adda > as a VSA under Freeswitch. The line should be removed as it is > redundant in any case. Thanks for reporting

[RADIATOR] Bug in default dictionary

2016-04-05 Thread Eddie Stassen
Hi, The version 4.16 dictionary has an open 'BEGIN-VENDOR Freeswitch' on line 9322. This means any ATTRIBUTE after that in the file will be adda as a VSA under Freeswitch. The line should be removed as it is redundant in any case. Eddie ___ radiator

Re: [RADIATOR] Bug in SessSQL.pm

2012-02-14 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Eddie, thanks for reporting this. It has now been fixed in the latest patch set. Cheers. On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 03:53:04 PM Eddie Stassen wrote: > UpdateQuery crashes Radiator when the query > contains %{Quote:...}. This is due to $self not being passed as the > third parameter to Ra

[RADIATOR] Bug in SessSQL.pm

2012-02-14 Thread Eddie Stassen
UpdateQuery crashes Radiator when the query contains %{Quote:...}. This is due to $self not being passed as the third parameter to Radius::Util::format_special(). The patch below fixes it. Regards, Eddie Stassen --- SessSQL.pm.ORIG 2012-02-14 15:32:12.0 +0200 +++ SessSQL.pm 2012-02

Re: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

2003-06-30 Thread Ken Wolstencroft
CTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:38 AM Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs > Hello all, > > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 04:27 am, Ken Wolstencroft wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > > > I had the same problem and spent ages recompiling OpenSSL with all the ssl > >

Re: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

2003-06-30 Thread Mike McCauley
Hello Denis, On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:44 am, Denis Pavani wrote: > Hello, I got a strange behaviour from Radiator 3.6, on Solaris with > OpenSSL 0.9.7a > Most of time, all authentication are OK, but sometimes EAP-TLS stop > working, and gives errors as below. > Restarting the daemon (sending an HUP

Re: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

2003-06-30 Thread Mike McCauley
onResumption 0 fixed it. Cheers. > > All the best, > Ken > MyZones Ltd > > - Original Message - > From: "Denis Pavani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:44 PM > Subject: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

Re: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

2003-06-30 Thread Ken Wolstencroft
resumption seems to solve the problem. All the best, Ken MyZones Ltd - Original Message - From: "Denis Pavani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:44 PM Subject: (RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs > Hello, I got a strange behavi

(RADIATOR) BUG? EAP TLS hangs

2003-06-30 Thread Denis Pavani
Hello, I got a strange behaviour from Radiator 3.6, on Solaris with OpenSSL 0.9.7a Most of time, all authentication are OK, but sometimes EAP-TLS stop working, and gives errors as below. Restarting the daemon (sending an HUP signal does not work, I must kill process and restart) fixes the situat

RE: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-18 Thread Surajh Surjoo [ MTN Sandhurst ]
ey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 11:01 PM To: Surajh Surjoo [ MTN Sandhurst ]; Toomas Kärner; Hugh Irvine Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? Hello Surajh, thanks for your note. On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:15, Surajh Surjoo [ MTN Sandhurst ] wrote: >

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-18 Thread Mike McCauley
011 3016000 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Imagination is more important than Knowledge" - Albert Einstein > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike McCauley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 10:32 AM > To: Toomas Kärner; Hugh Irvine &

RE: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-18 Thread Surajh Surjoo [ MTN Sandhurst ]
] "Imagination is more important than Knowledge" - Albert Einstein -Original Message- From: Mike McCauley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 10:32 AM To: Toomas Kärner; Hugh Irvine Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? Hello Toomas, On Wed, 1

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-18 Thread Mike McCauley
ot;Toomas Kärner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:50 PM > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? > > > Hello Toomas - > > > > The fundamental issue is the architecture of Radiator

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-17 Thread Toomas Kärner
Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Toomas Kärner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:50 PM Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? > > Hello Toomas - > > The fundamental issue is the architectur

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-13 Thread Hugh Irvine
Original Message - From: "Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Toomas Kärner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:59 AM Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? Hello Toomas - This is not a bug really - it is more a configuratio

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-13 Thread Toomas Kärner
PROTECTED]> To: "Toomas Kärner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:59 AM Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? > > Hello Toomas - > > This is not a bug really - it is more a configuration issue. > > The problem that you

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Toomas - This is not a bug really - it is more a configuration issue. The problem that you show below is due to the fact that the AuthBy is looking for the username, and you are overriding it to look for something else. This leads to the AuthBy continuing to look for DEFAULT... . The c

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Toomas Kärner
"Service-Type" to something like "MAC address in blacklist". Rgds. Toomas - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:17 PM Subject: RE: (R

RE: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread david.kramar
AuthColumnDef 0, GENERIC,check AuthColumnDef 1, Reply-Message,reply Hope help David -Pùvodní zpráva- Od: Toomas Kärner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Odesláno: 12. prosince 2002 15:52 Komu: kramar; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pøedmìt: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? Hi, It works (partly - som

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Toomas Kärner
-%Y-%m-%d AddToReplyIfNotExist Nomadix-Bw-Down=8000,Nomadix-Bw-Up=8000,Idle-Timeout=3600 PostAuthHook file:"./wn/AdminPostAuthHook.pl" ######### - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; &

RE: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread david.kramar
øedmìt: Re: (RADIATOR) Bug? Yes, I know but as you can see it finds the account and then the NoDefault shouldn't be affective at all. NoDefault is useful ONLY if Select gives back Empty Set. So ... this is another issue ... - Original Message - From: "Ingvar Berg (EAB)" <[E

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Toomas Kärner
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:23 PM Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Bug? > There is some NoDefault parameter you could use in the looping AuthBy > > /Ingvar > > -Original Message- > From: Toomas Kärner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: d

RE: (RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Ingvar Berg (EAB)
There is some NoDefault parameter you could use in the looping AuthBy /Ingvar -Original Message- From: Toomas Kärner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 12 december 2002 11:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (RADIATOR) Bug? Hi When I have config like: AuthByPolicy

(RADIATOR) Bug?

2002-12-12 Thread Toomas Kärner
Hi When I have config like: AuthByPolicy ContinueUntilReject AuthBy Identifier_of_some_authby_that_gives_reject plahplah This kind a conf results loop in Identifier_of_some_authby_that_gives_reject and never goes to AuthBy SQL. debug 4 of such config (it had other problems as well but i

(RADIATOR) Re: Sybase Issue. [POSSIBLE RADIATOR BUG]

2002-11-22 Thread Mike McCauley
HEllo Carlos, On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:49, Carlos Molina wrote: > Greetings. > > I have the solution for the sybase issue. > > First. > > We should add the community column to the emerald system. > Radiator wants to take this field for the clients setup. > > 2) Module AuthEMERALD.pm have a bug. > I

(RADIATOR) Bug

2002-10-23 Thread Martin Edge
Hey Guys, Believe I have tripped across somewhere which could do with a bit more error checking I am able to reproduce it, but I'd prefer not to ;-) A previous configuration file that I upgraded to the new version of radiator was using formatted-date in an AcctColumnDef We use Oracle, and there

(RADIATOR) Bug? changing EUID/EGID with User/Group params doesn't work

2002-09-04 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi Hugh or Mike, I tried to set the gloabl parameters "User" and "Group" to change the effective ID's for better security. I got the following error in radiatorlog (trace 4): Wed Sep 4 14:17:06 2002: NOTICE: SIGHUP received: restarting Wed Sep 4 14:17:07 2002: DEBUG: Reading group file /etc/gr

(RADIATOR) Bug: still problems with AuthLDAP2 and TLS

2002-07-07 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi Hugh or Mike, short: The second time after starting a StartTLS connection against an OpenLDAP Server the radiusd crashes, the first time after start it works well. The radiusd crashes with the following error message: Can't call method "get_context_handle" without a package or object referen

(RADIATOR) Radiator bug?

2002-02-26 Thread Nick Rogness
There appears to be a bug of sorts in the RewriteFunction call. Under high loads, radiator would stop answering Access-Requests. THe udp recv buffers would pin out. After further inspection, a level 4 trace actually says everything was OK (Access-Accept) but the NAS would never receive the pac

(RADIATOR) bug on 2.19-1?

2002-01-10 Thread Utku Er
Hi, I was testing the radiator 2.19-1(licensed) on redhat latest. Installed from an RPM I am using auth by SQL and using sybase freeTDS to connect. I started it in my shell and run a test with radpwtst. Radiator stopped working with error like below. trace 6 debug is below of that. can anybody

Re: (RADIATOR) bug?: AuthLog not picked up by HUP

2001-04-19 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Dave - As posted yesterday, Mike will check this next week when he gets back. thanks Hugh On Friday 20 April 2001 01:48, Kitabjian, Dave wrote: > I have 2.18 + all patches running. Config section attached. > > I added the AuthLog parameter and the section, and they > weren't picked up unt

(RADIATOR) bug?: AuthLog not picked up by HUP

2001-04-19 Thread Kitabjian, Dave
I have 2.18 + all patches running. Config section attached. I added the AuthLog parameter and the section, and they weren't picked up until after restarting radiusd (completely). I know folks mentioned this earlier, but I thought that the reloading of Handlers was fixed with 2.18, so I thought

Re: (RADIATOR) bug report ?

2001-01-10 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Jan - On Wednesday 10 January 2001 21:42, Jan Matis wrote: > I have Radiator-2.16.3 on SuSE 6.2 > > Part of config file: > AuthPort 1645 > AcctPort 1646 > BindAdress xxx.xxx.xxx.67 > LocalAddress xxx.xxx.xxx.67 > .. > > and ip numbers: > xxx.xxx.xxx.67 > xxx.xxx.xxx.42 > > > As I under

(RADIATOR) bug report ?

2001-01-10 Thread Jan Matis
I have Radiator-2.16.3 on SuSE 6.2 Part of config file: AuthPort 1645 AcctPort 1646 BindAdress xxx.xxx.xxx.67 LocalAddress xxx.xxx.xxx.67 . and ip numbers: xxx.xxx.xxx.67 xxx.xxx.xxx.42 As I understood now should radiator listen and answer on xxx.xxx.xxx.67 is that true ? (if not how to do

(RADIATOR) Bug in ClientListSQL behaviour?

2000-09-29 Thread David Lloyd
When I kill -HUP my radiusd and I'm using ClientListSQL, and the query fails for whatever reason, the radius daemon dies quietly... shouldn't it stay up and simply not include the clients, maybe printing an error message in the logs so that I can -HUP it again after I fixed the problem? - D <[E

(RADIATOR) "Bug" in getProfiles

2000-04-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello The getProfiles Startup-Hook that was posted on demand on this list earlier this year seems to have a bug or at least a design flaw. It cuts off the attribute list at 255 characters without giving an error message. Is there a way to force him to accept longer strings? It seems oddly to me

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug in NAS-Address-Port-List?

2000-01-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Phil - On Sat, 08 Jan 2000, Phil Freed wrote: > Hmm.. Let's try this again. I apologize for repeating all of the > detail here > > > > # > > > > > > > > > > > > The first item is commented out because it kills radius > > > with the message > > > Can't call method "log" on un

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug in NAS-Address-Port-List?

2000-01-08 Thread Phil Freed
Hmm.. Let's try this again. I apologize for repeating all of the detail here > > # > > > > > > > > The first item is commented out because it kills radius > > with the message > > Can't call method "log" on unblessed reference at > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Radius/A

Re: (RADIATOR) Bug in NAS-Address-Port-List?

2000-01-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Phil - On Fri, 07 Jan 2000, Phil Freed wrote: > This may or may not be related my accounting record problem. > (I suspect not.) > > I need a special handler for slot 6 on one of my NASs. I have > the following sections in my radius.cfg: > > # > > > > The first item is commented ou

(RADIATOR) Bug in NAS-Address-Port-List?

2000-01-07 Thread Phil Freed
This may or may not be related my accounting record problem. (I suspect not.) I need a special handler for slot 6 on one of my NASs. I have the following sections in my radius.cfg: # The first item is commented out because it kills radius with the message Can't call method "log" on u

Re: (RADIATOR) BUG: After SIGHUP radiator doesn't proper reread the config file

1999-04-27 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Karl, You are tight. We found this problem recently. It is fixed for the next release. In the meantime, you will need to restart you Radiator if you change the Realms in your config. Thanks for reporting it to us. Cheers. On Apr 27, 11:17am, Karl Gaissmaier wrote: > Subject: (RADIATOR)

(RADIATOR) BUG: After SIGHUP radiator doesn't proper reread the config file

1999-04-27 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi, when I change the config file from ... ... <\Realm> to ... ... <\Handler> ... ... <\Handler> and send a SIGHUP to the radiator, he is still trying to handle the requests with the Realm 'Realm=', even if there is no longer ANY Realm Clause