Title: Message
Hi
Folks,
This
isn't a radiator specific question but should be of general
interest:
We
have a need where in certain emergencies, we need to block/refuse/busy a call
which is in-coming on our MAX TNT. We don't want the go through the process of
having the RAS send a acce
A technique we are experimenting with is to use a load balancer before
the radiusd processes. We setup a dual proc system with two IP
addresses. Then we run two radiusd processes where each process is bound
to a one of the IP addresses. Then the load balancer (foundry server
iron) is configured to
And this seems to have helped. From what I can tell, others have also
had problems with TNT sending NULL usernames.
Thanks again,
mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:27 PM
To: Mahesh Neelakanta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT
l.
mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Elias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:10 PM
To: Mahesh Neelakanta
Cc: Hugh Irvine
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) NULL usernames in Radius Packets
***
Your mail has been scanned by TMnet VirusWall.
*
Hello,
We are seeing the following error in radiator.log:
Tue Sep 30 16:56:20 2003: ERR: do failed for 'insert into RADONLINE
(USERNAME, NASIDENTIFIER, NASPORT,ACCTSESSIONID, TIMESTAMP,
FRAMEDIPADDRESS, NASPORTTYPE, SERVICETYPE,CALLERID,CLIENTPORTDNIS)
values ('', 'XX.XX.XX.XX', 01071,'432626086'
ptember 13, 2003 6:43 PM
To: Mahesh Neelakanta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) AddToReply Usage
Hello Mahesh -
You can use the "RejectHasReason" in your Realm or Handler clause.
See section 6.16.23 in the Radiator 3.6 reference manual
("doc/ref.html").
regards
Hello from Sunny South Florida, USA,
I have a pretty simple question: We want to add the attribute
"Reply-Message" only when we reject a connection. For example if we have
a handler:
Identifier Test_Group
AuthByPolicy ContinueUntilReject
AuthBy Auth_1
AuthBy Radius_2
AuthBy File
se clauses, etc.
regards
Hugh
On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 23:51 Australia/Melbourne, Mahesh
Neelakanta wrote:
Is there a way to enable all handlers to
use a single AuthLOG? I.e. we have many, many handlers and need to log
success/failures to find out if we are f
Title: Message
Is there a way to
enable all handlers to use a single AuthLOG? I.e. we have many, many
handlers and need to log success/failures to find out if we are failing
authentications. However, we want to avoid having to code this into each
handler.
thanks,
mahesh
ps. quick &
dirt
