ructure Architect]
>
> voice:407.515.8633
> fax:407.515.9001
>
> ClearSky Mobile Media, Inc.
> 56 E. Pine St. Suite 200
> Orlando, FL 32801
> USA
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesus Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 2:3
Hello,
My SIP proxy authenticates REGISTER and INVITE requests against Radiator. I
would like to be able to diferentiate between both requests.
This is a REGISTER request:
Code: Access-Request
Identifier: 104
Authentic: <217><134><30>y<250>D<214>j<212>`N\F<254>{<222>
Attributes:
U
Hello,
Is still needed to use a PreClientHook to make mysql accounting of
multiple cisco-avpair attributes?
Thanks.
---
Jesus Rodriguez
Endercom Comunicaciones, S.L.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.endercom.com
Tel. +34 934424293
his is the "Proxy-Authorization" line of the INVITE:
Proxy-Authorization: Digest
username="1000",realm="citem.com",nonce="3f2fd1ac0c62d52ecf72c69f5d967bee4310c1f8",response="2a4c4bc49581d5e32071ddfeec372ffc",uri="sip:[EMAIL
ribute
sent for pre-auth is:
Service-Type=Call-Check
Saludos
JesusR.
---------
Jesus Rodriguez
IP Engineering & Security Manager
Grupo Tiscali España
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tiscali.es
Tel. + (34) 93-3930800
-
===
Archive at
there.
Saludos
JesusR.
---------
Jesus Rodriguez
IP Engineering & Security Manager
Grupo Tiscali España
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tiscali.es
Tel. + (34) 93-3930800
-
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Hello,
I'm receiving an "Ascend-Number-Session" packet from my APX wich is not
replied by radiator with an "accounting-accept". This way, APX thinks
radiator is "dead" and tries the second radiator and then, the third and ...
Can this packet be answered with an "accounting-accept" by radiator?
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> On this topic however, many of our customers are using UDP redirectors in front
> of multiple Radiator hosts as an alternative way of providing more processing
> power (and added redundancy).
Hi Hugh,
Please, can you tell some of those UDP redirectors?
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, FlintHillsTechnical Support wrote:
> we have started a new ISP service where users dial into to a remote NAS that then
>authenticates the user across an L2F tunnel through our Cisco 7206. We can
>authenticate the user and allow access, however in the initial accounting rec
