[RADIATOR] R: Tunnel-Preference Round-Roubin

2014-02-13 Thread Fabio Prina
eikki Vatiainen Inviato: martedì 11 febbraio 2014 17.32 A: radiator@open.com.au Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] Tunnel-Preference Round-Roubin On 02/10/2014 04:25 PM, Fabio Prina wrote: > Till now I've added the Server-Endpoint and the other attrs via a > DefaultReply and the Tunnel-Preference vi

[RADIATOR] Tunnel-Preference Round-Roubin

2014-02-10 Thread Fabio Prina
Hi All, I've to spread connections between N l2tp tunnel: Tunnel-Server-Endpoint="1:10.0.0.1" Tunnel-Server-Endpoint="2:10.0.0.2" Tunnel-Server-Endpoint="3:10.0.0.3" Tunnel-Type="1:L2TP" Tunnel-Type="2:L2TP" Tunnel-Type="3:L2TP" [ ... ] Tunnel-Preference="1:1" Tunnel-Preference="2:2" Tunnel-Prefe

[RADIATOR] R: LDAP shadowExpire

2014-02-05 Thread Fabio Prina
->get('shadowExpire'); $_[3]->get_check->add_attr("Expiration", $shadowExpire * 86400); } Robert Fisher Systems Administrator Sitestar Internet Services On 2/4/2014 10:11 AM, Fabio Prina wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm using posixAccount/shadowAccount users

[RADIATOR] LDAP shadowExpire

2014-02-04 Thread Fabio Prina
Hi All, I'm using posixAccount/shadowAccount users in a LDAP and I would like to use the shadowExpire attribute to check the Expiration ... but the value is expressed days since the 01/01/1970 and not seconds Maybe is a stupid question but is there a way to use this attribute? Like multiply

[RADIATOR] TACACS peer name

2013-11-25 Thread Fabio Prina
Hello, In my TACACS trace 4 logs I see, not so few, rows like: Mon Nov 25 14:21:25 2013: ERR: Could not get peer name on TacacsplusConnection socket: Transport endpoint is not connected Mon Nov 25 14:21:25 2013: DEBUG: TacacsplusConnection disconnected from : Mon Nov 25 14:21:29 2013: ERR: Coul

[RADIATOR] R: R: digipass PinEnabled

2013-07-02 Thread Fabio Prina
:53 A: radiator@open.com.au Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] R: digipass PinEnabled On 06/25/2013 09:19 PM, Fabio Prina wrote: > In any case I'll appreciate your help > All my tokens are "Digipass Go 6" I think your only choice is to see if there is a second file or a folder mention

[RADIATOR] R: digipass PinEnabled

2013-06-25 Thread Fabio Prina
:45 A: radiator@open.com.au Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] digipass PinEnabled On 06/24/2013 01:26 PM, Fabio Prina wrote: > Sorry if this question is not really related to RADIATOR: > > I have implemented a AuthBy SQLDIGIPASS and all works fine ... but > I've imported in my db 2 dpx fi

[RADIATOR] digipass PinEnabled

2013-06-24 Thread Fabio Prina
Hello, Sorry if this question is not really related to RADIATOR: I have implemented a AuthBy SQLDIGIPASS and all works fine ... but I've imported in my db 2 dpx files; the tokens in the 1st files had the PinEnabled set to NO and the ones in the 2nd to YES For my purposes I do not need the PIN;

[RADIATOR] R: TACACS: context & Calling-Station-Id

2013-03-15 Thread Fabio Prina
ainen Inviato: venerdì 15 marzo 2013 07:05 A: radiator@open.com.au Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] TACACS: context & Calling-Station-Id On 03/14/2013 06:18 PM, Fabio Prina wrote: > I'm developing a hook to return different "GroupMemberAttr" based on the > Calling-Station-Id and NAS-IP

[RADIATOR] TACACS: context & Calling-Station-Id

2013-03-14 Thread Fabio Prina
Hi, I'm developing a hook to return different "GroupMemberAttr" based on the Calling-Station-Id and NAS-IP-Address of the request. The same user from 2 different clients can has different permissions but; "the context" is based only on NAS-IP-Address and this cause me permissions override betw

[RADIATOR] R: ContinueWhileAccept & proxy

2013-01-28 Thread Fabio Prina
...@open.com.au [mailto:radiator-boun...@open.com.au] Per conto di Heikki Vatiainen Inviato: lunedì 28 gennaio 2013 19:21 A: radiator@open.com.au Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] ContinueWhileAccept & proxy On 01/28/2013 04:21 PM, Fabio Prina wrote: > I’ve noticed a strange behavi

[RADIATOR] ContinueWhileAccept & proxy

2013-01-28 Thread Fabio Prina
Hi Guys, I’ve noticed a strange behavior on the AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileAccept If in the AuthBy chain I proxy the request the further clauses are ignored Is it normal ? ### A very stupid example # NOTICE: Server started: Radiator 4.11 on dev # AUTHs Identifier UserFILE1 Fi

[RADIATOR] R: R: EAP-Peap-ntlm stops

2011-12-15 Thread Fabio Prina
Thanks Heikki, I proxied the inner auth to another radiator with a smb 3.4.7 (Ubuntu lucid) and all work fine ... all except an annoying and uncompressible message related to the certificate on windows :-\ but this is another story :-) Cheers -- Fabio Prina System Specialist Easynet T +39 02

[RADIATOR] R: EAP-Peap-ntlm stops

2011-12-12 Thread Fabio Prina
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Heikki Vatiainen [mailto:h...@open.com.au] > Inviato: mercoledì 7 dicembre 2011 21:13 > A: Fabio Prina > Cc: Radiator ML (radiator@open.com.au) > Oggetto: Re: [RADIATOR] EAP-Peap-ntlm stops > > On 12/06/2011 11:53 PM, Fabio Prina wr

[RADIATOR] EAP-Peap-ntlm stops

2011-12-06 Thread Fabio Prina
Hi, I'm trying to authenticate my office WIFI network If in the inner auth I use a AuthBy FILE all works fine but if I use NTLM the communication stops just after the last Access-Challenge (with a success) Anyway if I use a wrong password I receive an access-reject Do you have any idea ? Ch