I've been trying out nanopass
(https://github.com/nanopass/nanopass-framework-racket) and its tutorial
scheme-to-c compiler (https://github.com/LeifAndersen/racket-to-c). However,
Racket takes easily 20s to bytecompile the c compiler, which is totally
unacceptable, especially with Racket's norm
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 3:08:16 PM UTC, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 4:58 PM, stef wrote:
>
> > Typed Racket has similar huge performance problems, so I'm actually
> > worried about fundamental limitations of Racket as a host.
>
>
&g
2 matches
Mail list logo