Yes - it was (of course) "pilot error"!
I had installed racket some years ago, and forgot I had env variables set,
and that they would be under PLT*.
Thanks for everyone's time and the folks over @ racket.slack.com!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
The end of the Prologue to HtDP2e ends with a section titled You Are a
Programmer Now. If you have read it you know what it contains (if you
haven't read it then you are not likely able to respond intelligently to
this question).
My question is: in that section are the authors describing "progr
up in the face of Sussman's perspective? Does one need
the lessons of HtDP if all one is doing is stitching together libraries and
APIs?
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 3:43:59 PM UTC-4, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 1, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Scott >
> wrote:
>
en my experience.
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 2:52:55 PM UTC-4, Scott wrote:
>
> The end of the Prologue to HtDP2e ends with a section titled You Are a
> Programmer Now. If you have read it you know what it contains (if you
> haven't read it then you are not likely able to respond in
Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 2, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Scott >
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you. I am not technically sufficient to add much to your response.
> Will the core curriculum become available online?
>
>
> I am not sure what you mean by “
The online version has a broken link to recommended reading.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Is there another location for the information I assume resided within the
broken link? Thanks!
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 4:58:14 PM UTC-5, Scott wrote:
>
> The online version has a broken link to recommended reading.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
d like the correct url for a github repo
is not git: but github:, and it needed the branch name tacked on at the end.
I managed to get my package listed, and I don't mean to complain. Just thought
I'd mention it in case it revealed some particular bug with the website.
Cheers,
e for command line racket, but it didn't work for
DrRacket.
Thanks,
Scott Hickey
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Like this? http://bugs.racket-lang.org/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David T. Pierson wrote:
> It'd be nice if there was a way to submit bug reports via
> racket-lang.org. Or perhaps there is and I don't see it? Or perhaps
> there was and it attracted too much spam.
>
> Regardless, it woul
Are there any plans for a RacketCon 2012?
Scott Hickey
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
when
impersonated. I have included a small module that demonstrates the issue
below. I expect that the two checks at the bottom should succeed.
Thanks,
Scott
#lang racket
(require rackunit)
(define-values (prop:my-prop my-prop? my-prop-accessor)
(make-impersonator-property 'my-prop))
(define (ma
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for working on this so quickly! Unfortunately, It looks like there is a
bug in the fix that causes segfaults when checking impersonator properties on
keyword procedures that are not impersonators. I’ve included a small test case
below.
Thanks again,
Scott
#lang racket
ist, it tries to fully-expand but dies complaining that define-values
is not in a definition context).
I think I'm probably misreading the documentation. Can anyone suggest a
correct solution?
Thanks,
Scott
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse
syntax/parse
al context. The downside is that your macro will
need to work correctly in this "staged" fashion where things run as the
expander gets to them.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Scott
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> Based on the documentation, I thought th
can modify the
build we use in production, but can't afford more than a minor
(<15%) decrease in performance.
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails f
On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 3:48:22 PM UTC-7, neil wrote:
> Does adding the executable pathname to the `gdb` command line (i.e.,
> format `gdb EXECUTABLE-FILE CORE-FILE`) give you the symbols?
Ah, of course. Yes, now we're getting somewhere:
#0 0x00080146b6ca in thr_kill () from /lib/
On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 4:05:20 PM UTC-7, Scott Bell wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 3:48:22 PM UTC-7, neil wrote:
> > Does adding the executable pathname to the `gdb` command line (i.e.,
> > format `gdb EXECUTABLE-FILE CORE-FILE`) give you the symbols?
>
> Ah
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:23:32 -0700 (PDT), Scott Bell wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 4:05:20 PM UTC-7, Scott Bell wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 3:48:22 PM UTC-7, neil wrote:
>
On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 8:05:47 PM UTC-7, neil wrote:
> Scott Bell wrote on 07/08/2015 09:23 PM:
> [...]
> >> ...
> >> #6 0x00080153e004 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
> >> #7 0x000800a72bf3 in scheme_make_byte_string_without_copying ()
On Friday, July 10, 2015 at 12:05:55 AM UTC-7, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:08:53 -0700 (PDT), Scott Bell wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-7, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > At Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:23:32 -0700 (PDT), Scott Bell wrote:
> >
(shill-lang.org). You can find a short
description of how we did this in section 3.1 of the paper (
http://shill.seas.harvard.edu/shill-osdi-2014.pdf).
Cheers,
Scott
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Sean Lynch wrote:
> Hi, folks. I'd like to implement an LPMUD-like multi-user prog
compiler transformation or a subtlety in the
reachability analysis? Or a bug?
Thanks,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-user
hen you end up
with a non-empty closure (i.e., allocated at run time) due to the
reference to `box`, and so you get `#f` at the end as you expect.
I don't know why PasteRack produces #f, but it must not hold onto the
namespace.
At Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:07:52 -0400, Scott Moore wrote:
5])
(display y)
(define y 10)
y)
On November 3, 2015 at 8:51:38 AM, Éric Tanter (etan...@dcc.uchile.cl) wrote:
Thanks all! This is helpful — the mental model of begin that I presented to my
students was too simple to account for defines.
-- Éric
On Nov 2, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Scott Moore
One place where this can go wrong is with contracts.
Contracts are implemented using chaperones and impersonators (depending on the
particular contract)
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/chaperones.html?q=chaperone#%28tech._chaperone%29.
Because of how chaperones and impersonators work, a p
Yes, around 80% of the time if I disable macro hiding, and sometimes even with
macro hiding if I’m moving back and forth through a long sequence of steps.
I had been meaning to file a report...
On February 11, 2016 at 11:27:21 AM, Matthias Felleisen (matth...@ccs.neu.edu)
wrote:
... has anyone
Whoops left off the mailing list...
On March 10, 2016 at 2:48:49 PM, Scott Moore (sdmo...@fas.harvard.edu) wrote:
On March 10, 2016 at 2:41:53 PM, Leif Andersen (l...@leifandersen.net) wrote:
On the other hand, I'm all down for making a `literal` or `exact`
scribble form that spits ou
If the definitions are saved as “test.rkt”, the following works:
#lang racket
(module a racket/base (displayln "hello"))
(dynamic-require '(submod "test.rkt" a) #f)
On March 16, 2016 at 12:13:46 PM, Jos Koot (jos.k...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
The following example of dynamic-require in the r
list-ref sorted-list middle-position)
(list-ref sorted-list (+ 1 middle-position)))
2
Thanks for any feedback - hopefully I'm not going to ignite a war
about formatting. I just like to see my coding style mature from
beginner to advanced beginner :)
Is there a file somewhere I should be looking at to understand what
I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
Scott Hickey
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Is there a central Web page describing what typed-scheme
wrapper modules exist, their location (or inclusion in the Racket
distribution) and general type-scheme status?
Mucho thanks in advance.
Scott
_
For list-related administrative tasks
"if" just for example.
I'm not asking about a lecture on the wisdom of doing so.
I'm just asking how.
Thanks a million in advance.
Scott
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
oversight. But I imagine
there is some configuration option that I have not yet discovered.
All real, authoritative knowledge on this issue greatly appreciated.
Scott
On 10/3/2010 8:51 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
What do you mean by highlighting, precisely? I assume clicking "check
syntax"
Any suggestions ,based on individual's own configurations, in
which columns to "best" add various excluded keywords - if,
the new struct, any others, etc.?
Thanks!
Scott
On 10/3/2010 10:32 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Edit|Preferences, Editing, Indenting. Add "if" to one
I'm curious if there is a capability to define typed macros,
ideally catching errors at the macro "call site" instead of
within the expansion. If not, is there any interest in such a
facility?
Scott
_
For list-related administrati
I'm wondering if SRFI 42 (eager comprehensions) is
available within typed racket.
I tried (require typed/srfi/42) and received an error, but
I'm hoping I did something wrong or that some typed racket
interface may be available by some other means.
Thanks very much in advance
Thanks for reminding me of Racket's native comprehensions.
I totally forgot. Thanks!
Scott
On 10/8/2010 1:32 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
You know Typed Racket supports Racket's native comprehensions, right?
N.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
I'm wonde
e.
3) How I can easily process the Scribble documentation external
to the source file, and without modifying the source, using some
tool for batch processing via a make file (or similar tool).
I'm sure I'll get this eventually. Thanks much in advance!
Scott
__
configuration and or code
structuring and interactive evaluation tactics.
Any and all advice greatly appreciated! Thanks much in
advance!
- Scott
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
ime-prose.rkt:27:0
C:\Program Files\Racket\collects\racket\private\misc.rkt:74:7
The same definition and a following expression - (Foo 10) - type-check,
compile and evaluate perfectly well in DrRacket using #lang typed/scheme
and just clicking the 'Run' button.
Thanks much for any and all
The Web site at the URL you name still claims that the Quack
available for download is from "2009-10-14" - a year old.
Is there some reason the new version you mention is not
available for download?
Thanks much!
- Scott
On 10/14/2010 1:39 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
I think probably y
Couldn't find docs on this syntax form using regular
docs search.
Many thanks in advance. -Scott
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
using Moby will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott Hickey
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
se for #f
Thanks in advance for any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong here.
Scott Hickey
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>> I was looking at the ping pong app
>> http://www.wescheme.org/openEditor?publicId=beech-hoops-whirl-route-slept
>>
>> an
ll be
appreciated, thanks.
Scott Hickey
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
I'm using racket/cmdline to process command line arguments for my
program. Is there a way to enter "pseudo" command line arguments to
one's program within DrRacket? I recall this feature was available way
back in the '80-90s era Turbo* language IDE days.
Much thanks in advance for any and all advi
Is there any way to integrate DrScheme with SVN, I suppose
in some manner similar to Emacs or via some other type of
interface?
Many thanks.
- Scott
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Here's what I see... any ideas?
I've been running it under dtruss/dtrace to try and spot what is different,
but so far no luck.
If run the IDE it also works!
bash-3.2$ racket
Welcome to Racket v6.11.
standard-module-name-resolver: collection not found
for module path: (submod (lib "racket/in
Also, I've tried both:
brew cask install racket
and
brew install racket
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Scott Watson wrote:
>
> Here's what I see... any ideas?
>
> I've been running it under dtruss/dtrace to try and spot what is
> differe
munication protocol with the kernel and filesystem API does
not reuse libfuse functionality, and this dependency will be removed in a
future release.
The FUSE API is huge and I've only done very limited testing, so there are
likely bugs. If you encounter some, please file an issue!
Cheers,
Scott
-
On October 12, 2016 at 12:15:38 PM, Dupéron Georges
(jahvascriptman...@gmail.com) wrote:
This is great! Thumbs up, and thanks for writing this library. I have a couple
of filesystems in my "TODO" list, hopefully this package will motivate me to
actually write them one of these days :) .
Awesome
On October 12, 2016 at 2:35:37 PM, Vincent St-Amour
(stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu) wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:31:46 -0500,
Scott Moore wrote:
>
> PS: is the documentation for use-once/c somewhere?
>
> I’ll add it to the docs when I get a chance. You can see the defini
4:53 PM, Scott Moore wrote:
> On October 12, 2016 at 2:35:37 PM, Vincent St-Amour
> (stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:31:46 -0500,
> Scott Moore wrote:
>>
>> PS: is the documentation for use-once/c somewhere?
>>
parameter
implementation), or to just provide a standalone combinator. I would need to
refresh my memory to see what exactly would need to be done for either.
Cheers,
Scott
On November 23, 2016 at 7:35:32 AM, Robby Findler
(ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu(mailto:ro...@eecs.northwestern.e
which I’m not sure that
chaperone-procedure’s existing API would support. Would this require
modification of procedure chaperones to support parameters directly,
or is there some way to implement it separately?
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Scott Moore wrote:
>
> Yes, we worke
Robby beat me to it. For a longer discussion, see Christos, Robby, Cormac and
Matthias’ paper: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/popl11-dfff.pdf on the
difference between dependent (->d) and indy-dependent contracts (->i).
A contrived example of why this is better is:
(define/contract (foo x y)
Has anyone tried/started getting racket up and running as the back end embedded
into a universal windows platform app?
Aka using xaml to layout the gui and using racket for all the thinking bits
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
Unfortunately that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid as while that will work
just fine for desktop windows as I can separate the processes easily enough
there and just have them talk via any of the many protocols(you guys mentioned)
for conversing between 2 separate binary's on the same system
Parameters are thread local, and from reading the docs of virtual-connection
and connection-pool, I think they create new threads to handle the connections.
These threads are probably created before you parameterize, and thus see the
original values.
Try replacing the virtual-connection stuff w
On the other hand, if I recall correctly SML has the same behavior as racket. I
think the implementation uses a chain of "stacklets" that are heap allocated.
On Apr 27, 2017, 8:07 PM -0400, Jon Zeppieri , wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 0
Hijacking this thread a little, but a pet peeve: ‘(1 2 3) is not short for
(list 1 2 3), it just happens to evaluate to that…
(let ([x 0]) (list x x)) -> (list 0 0)
(let ([x 0]) ‘(x x)) -> (list ‘x ‘x)
Perhaps the reader should implement #l(, which inserts an explicit `list` at
the beginning of
quotation once too many times. ;)
On May 1, 2017, 2:04 PM -0400, Scott Moore , wrote:
> Hijacking this thread a little, but a pet peeve: ‘(1 2 3) is not short for
> (list 1 2 3), it just happens to evaluate to that…
>
> (let ([x 0]) (list x x)) -> (list 0 0)
> (let ([x 0]) ‘(x
tion involves some
type of beta reduction and/or argument constraints, but I'm just looking
for a nudge in the right direction.
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
200-1575 W. Georgia
Vancouver, BC V6G2V
n.
>
It would be really nice to print the source code of a known procedure on
the repl, in order to get a quick view of what it does. Or, the "pa"
function which prints out the arguments of a procedure is even more useful.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
&g
ket-mode/blob/master/defn.rkt
I'll look into that code of yours.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Scott Klarenbach
> wrote:
> > It would be really nice to print the source code of a known procedure on
> the
> >
posted, most likely via random SOS pings to this list :).
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
> I'm playing around with the idea of a sort of "Language Integrated Query"
> lik
ing a simple mistake? Or am I resigned to manually parsing out the
single test-expr into multiple forms in the template?
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
200-1575 W. Georgia
Vancouver, BC V6G2V3
)
> (print 'test2))
> (define-values (x y z) (values 10 20 30))
> (my-fn x y z)
>
> => 102030'test1'test2
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Scott Klarenbach
> wrote:
> > I have a macro that modifies define to perform some additional
> processing.
>
missing?
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
200-1575 W. Georgia
Vancouver, BC V6G2V3
___
To iterate is human; to recur, divine
Racket Us
;> (require rackunit)
>> (test-case id-str
>> new-test-body ...]))
>>
>> (define/test (my-fn a b c)
>> (print a)
>> (print b)
>> (print c)
>> #:test
>> (check-true #t)
) body ...)
(module+ test
(require ru-require)
(test-case id-str test-body ...]))
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>> I changed it to this:
>>
>> (de
..]))
Notice the extra (require rackunit), after the modified (require
ru-require). Is that the right solution?
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>> I changed it to thi
.
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> Sorry, gmail sent before I could paste :(
>>
>> ...
>>
>> So I changed the macro definition to:
>>
>> (define-syntax (define/spec stx)
>> (syn
g reader file ie,
my-lang/lang/reader.rkt? Is there a shortcut to what I'm trying to do that
doesn't involve overriding read and read-syntax?
Either that or I might just have a simple mistake in my-lang.rkt file.
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Co
a bit foggy on the details.
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
200-1575 W. Georgia
Vancouver, BC V6G2V3
___
To iterate is human; to recur, divine
vide (for-doc ...))`, so far. I don't yet know how to
> make it work, but the problem is at least on my radar.
>
> At Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:43:03 -0800, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> > How can one file provide the bindings it required using the for-doc
> subform
> > to other modu
to
implement my own reader that internally uses at-exp 's read-syntax and read
functions?
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> You're right that `at-exp` isn't like `s-exp`, but you can use
>
> #lang at-exp s-exp "my-lang.rkt"
>
key
ingredient?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Yesterday, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> >
> > I assumed that #lang at-exp "my-lang.rkt" should work, since I'm
> > wanting to use at-exp syntax with "my-lang.rkt" semantics. I&#
hidden meta-data under the same binding to
other macros that might wish to know about the binding at compile time?
I'm specifically wondering how the overloading works. Is it some clever
use of prop:procedure?
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software
d
> at syntax-time to a value that implements both prop:procedure, so that it
> can expand to a use of the constructor when used in an expression, and
> prop:struct-info so that it can be use to look up static information when
> passed to relevant macros.
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
ething out via syntax-local-value that
> doesn't?
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> But I don't see how the same binding can be a transformer and also return
>> something else (like a list, or a checked-struct
acro (illegal syntax), or have (define-syntax (posn) #'something),
and then (syntax-local-value #'posn) returns the transformer, rather than
'something.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> It's not changing it, I'm just trying to figure out the
----
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:00:35 -0500
> From: Carl Eastlund
> To: "Alexander D. Knauth"
> Cc: Scott Klarenbach , Racket mailing list
>
> Subject: Re: [racket] Structs and
exts you have no
> control over.
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> If/when it does matter, instead you could use a hashtable on the side,
>>> mapping from the procedure to the info. Of course that way, you need
>>
the inner procedures I wish by applying local-expand
to the nested operands.
My question is:
1.) Is there a simple library way to do this with local-expand that I'm
missing?
2.) Does anyone have a hint or code example to do this manually using
recursion? It should be simple en
a
struct that I bind at compile time using your earlier tutorial on structs
and syntax-local-value (thanks by the way!)... I'm just simplifying here.*
sk
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Scott,
>
> What you're doing isn't possible -- isn't even
l))) 'expression #f)]
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
200-1575 W. Georgia
Vancouver, BC V6G2V3
___
To iterate is human; to recur, divine
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
referenced values in the same way
as would happen at runtime.
Thanks a lot.
Scott.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I see what you're doing now. You're not actually trying to use macro
> expansion at all; you're just using local-expan
edure->string"
operation, or a custom-write, that I will use to target sql or something
else. Any use of pred? at runtime within racket will run fine as is.
Thanks,
Scott.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Scott -- I don't understand exactly what you're
sion
I wanted to use?
Thanks,
Scott
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
r possibly a phase issue.
I have tried rewriting %rule a couple of different ways (one using syntax-rules
rather than syntax-case, and another using quasiquote/unquote rather than
with-syntax). Neither of which worked. Anyhow, I've spent a lot of time trying
to figure this out, and I finally am at the point where I need some help.
-Scott
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
ained
package is probably a good idea.
Cheers,
Scott
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:46 PM, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
wrote:
> Okay, Thank you.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, I corrected your program and ran into this bug.
rs to this end, or
does it more fundamentally extend Scheme to do things technically *impossible
*in that language?
Thanks a lot.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
#308 - 55 Water St.
Vancouver, BC V
ected argument of type
BUT this works:
>> (jsexpr->string (hash 'id 1 'title "core"))
"{\"id\":1,\"title\":\"core\"}"
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointy
My bad, thanks!
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
>
>> Is this a bug with the json module, or am I missing something about the
>> implementation?
>>
>> It seems it crashes w
Hi,
I was wondering about current status of Moby. Is it still active? How
stable? What is and is not yet supported?
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
#308 - 55 Water St.
Vancouver, BC V6B1A1
ting the #:method param works fine in the second example.
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
#308 - 55 Water St.
Vancouver, BC V6B1A1
___
To iterate is human;
, and the reader turns @x and @y into (@ x) and (@ y)
respectively.
Thanks.
--
Talk to you soon,
Scott Klarenbach
PointyHat Software Corp.
www.pointyhat.ca
p 604-568-4280
e sc...@pointyhat.ca
#308 - 55 Water St.
Vancouver, BC V6B1A1
___
To iterate is human
-my-action), but would
prefer the token to be self-contained as in (@x = 2) or ($do-something).
Scott.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Wednesday, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> > Is it possible to have a macro bound to an identifier with wildcards
> > in it?
> >
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
