[racket] Central typed-scheme information?

2010-10-01 Thread Scott McLoughlin
Is there a central Web page describing what typed-scheme wrapper modules exist, their location (or inclusion in the Racket distribution) and general type-scheme status? Mucho thanks in advance. Scott _ For list-related administrative tasks: http

[racket] How can I add new keywords (for syntax highlighting) to DrRacket ?

2010-10-03 Thread Scott McLoughlin
"if" just for example. I'm not asking about a lecture on the wisdom of doing so. I'm just asking how. Thanks a million in advance. Scott _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Re: [racket] How can I add new keywords (for syntax highlighting) to DrRacket ?

2010-10-03 Thread Scott McLoughlin
is not what you're looking for? If you want something that is insensitive to the actual langauge (ie would highlight if even if if weren't a keyword) and worked in an "online" manner, than the colorer is what you'd want, but you'd probably have to do some minor dr

Re: [racket] How can I add new keywords (for syntax highlighting) to DrRacket ?

2010-10-05 Thread Scott McLoughlin
of those columns. If you dont' want to change the indentation of if, but do want it to be a keyword, then DrRacket isn't currently flexible enough for you (patches welcome). Robby On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote: It's very, very simple. When I type

[racket] Typed syntax (macros) for typed/racket?

2010-10-05 Thread Scott McLoughlin
I'm curious if there is a capability to define typed macros, ideally catching errors at the macro "call site" instead of within the expansion. If not, is there any interest in such a facility? Scott _ For list-related administrative tasks: http:/

[racket] typed racket and SRFI 42 ?

2010-10-07 Thread Scott McLoughlin
I'm wondering if SRFI 42 (eager comprehensions) is available within typed racket. I tried (require typed/srfi/42) and received an error, but I'm hoping I did something wrong or that some typed racket interface may be available by some other means. Thanks very much in advance. - Scott

Re: [racket] typed racket and SRFI 42 ?

2010-10-08 Thread Scott McLoughlin
Thanks for reminding me of Racket's native comprehensions. I totally forgot. Thanks! Scott On 10/8/2010 1:32 AM, Noel Welsh wrote: You know Typed Racket supports Racket's native comprehensions, right? N. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote: I'm wonde

[racket] Seeking examples of Scribble "4.5 In-Source Documentation" for Racket (typed/racket ?) source files

2010-10-11 Thread Scott McLoughlin
I've read the docs a few times, but either I must have some odd "Scribble-blind-spot" or something, or this is much more involved than I imagine it really is. I'm hoping a few illustrative source examples would help get me started, and maybe a just a bare bones, simplified "how to" to get me goi

[racket] How to use typed/racket within Emacs and scheme top level ???

2010-10-13 Thread Scott McLoughlin
I tried (require typed/scheme) in the scheme evaluation buffer and then basic expressions evaluated with C-c-e (such as #(44 #\c), say) evaluate fine with nice type annotations. But struct: definitions always generate an error. Specifically, just the test case (struct: Foo ([a : Fixnum])) genera

Re: [racket] How to use typed/racket within Emacs and scheme top level ???

2010-10-17 Thread Scott McLoughlin
Typed racket at the repl still isn't working for me. Even using "racket -I /typed racket", I still cannot create simple structures from within the the racket repl. Here is a transcript from a Windows cmd.com session (just to take Emacs and Quack out of the equation for now). C:\Documents and

Re: [racket] How to use typed/racket within Emacs and scheme top level ???

2010-10-17 Thread Scott McLoughlin
The Web site at the URL you name still claims that the Quack available for download is from "2009-10-14" - a year old. Is there some reason the new version you mention is not available for download? Thanks much! - Scott On 10/14/2010 1:39 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: I think probably you need to

[racket] Quick question - use of ". -> ." synatx

2010-12-24 Thread Scott McLoughlin
Couldn't find docs on this syntax form using regular docs search. Many thanks in advance. -Scott _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

[racket] DrScheme and Version Control Integration

2011-07-07 Thread Scott McLoughlin
Is there any way to integrate DrScheme with SVN, I suppose in some manner similar to Emacs or via some other type of interface? Many thanks. - Scott _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users