Hi,
I am working on some scribble and I am having trouble understanding
what's going on with a few cases. Here's a simple test:
test.scrbl:
---
#lang scribble/book
@require[scribble/example
scribble/manual
scribble-abbrevs
scriblib/footnote]
@title{Scribble to odt}
@a
>
>
> 1. @#reader scribble/comment-reader doesn't help comments to be rendered
> in this case. Is it because it only works with a racketblock? How can I
> get comments in examples to be displayed
>
This is asked in the Slack channel recently. Florence replied:
You want `code:comment` I think:
Hi,
The HiFive1 is a 32 bit integer only machine, sadly. I guess I must admit
being a bit old to re-do software floating point. I still have nightmares of
ARM and then later 68000 systems.
Your right about the HiFive Unleashed would be a good system, but, expensive.
There is
On 08/01/2019 13:34, Bruce O'Neel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The HiFive1 is a 32 bit integer only machine, sadly. I guess I must
> admit being a bit old to re-do software floating point. I still have
> nightmares of ARM and then later 68000 systems.
>
> Your right about the HiFive Unleashed would b
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:38:07PM -0300, Andrei Formiga wrote:
> Sorry to slightly hijack the thread here, but what would be a good RISC-V
> dev board to experiment with Racket on it?
Not available at all yet, but there's the Libre-RISC-V development,
being discussed on a mailing list:
http://l
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:58 PM Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> George Neuner wrote on 1/7/19 4:49 PM:
> > Though I mostly agree with you, your "advice" does have its uses:
> >
> >
> http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-generic-functions.html
> > in particular see the sections on method
Won't emulators like QEMU do good enough job for the initial ironing out of
problems like the mentioned RISC-V backend for Chez and libffi for Racket?
I would even presume that they would be faster for this task compared to
using a real dev board. Emulation hHost processor can be quite the beast,
m
Apologies for the backtracking, but I'm still having trouble understanding
before/after/between and ordinary function composition. For non-method
functions, what's the difference?
Also, I'd never heard of these functions as a Perl dev. A quick search
turns up Moose. Is that what you're talking abo
Hi Neil,
On 1/7/2019 9:58 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
George Neuner wrote on 1/7/19 4:49 PM:
Though I mostly agree with you, your "advice" does have its uses:
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-generic-functions.html
in particular see the sections on method combinations.
On 08/01/2019 18:01, Alexander Shopov wrote:
> Won't emulators like QEMU do good enough job for the initial ironing out
> of problems like the mentioned RISC-V backend for Chez and libffi for
> Racket?
Yes, they will. For sure. I own a Hifive Unleashed but use it mostly for
nightly testing. For
My bad. I confused ordinary with generic.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 9:47 AM Eric Griffis Apologies for the backtracking, but I'm still having trouble understanding
> before/after/between and ordinary function composition. For non-method
> functions, what's the difference?
>
> Also, I'd never heard of
Sorry, I think I was being very unclear. I was only discouraging
something `defadvice`-like mutating the behavior of normal Racket
procedures, which looks like what was probably originally described:
> (define (greet name)
(println (string-append "Hi, " name)))
[...]
> (before greet ~a)
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:47 PM Eric Griffis wrote:
> Apologies for the backtracking, but I'm still having trouble understanding
> before/after/between and ordinary function composition. For non-method
> functions, what's the difference?
>
Easy extension of existing code. For example:
(define
great piece by Michelle Goldberg, imho:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/07/opinion/rashida-tlaib-profanity.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Den tir. 8. jan. 2019 kl. 21.40 skrev David Storrs :
>
> This. In an ideal world, before/after/around would be parameterized so
> that you can make the change only for a defined scope.
>
Still, the intent was never that it would extend its effects outside the
> current module.
>
In that case you
This is totally inappropriate.
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 4:09 PM, Tim Hanson wrote:
>
> great piece by Michelle Goldberg, imho:
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/07/opinion/rashida-tlaib-profanity.html
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Rac
Sorry! Yes, wrong list; noticed immediately; deleted immediately, butI guess
that doesn’t stop the mails.
Mea maxima culpa.
I’ll try to be more careful in the future.
Tim
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 10:37 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>
>
> This is totally inappropriate.
>
>
>> On Jan 8, 20
(build-path/convention-type type
base
sub ...) → path-for-some-system?
type : (or/c 'unix 'windows)
base : (or/c path-string? path-for-some-system? 'up 'same)
sub :
(or/c (and/c (or/c path-string? path-for-some-system?)
(not/c complete-path?))
(or/c 'up 'same))
> (bu
Hi,
If I understand the racket code correctly (*), you cannot generate windows
paths using strings on unix.
But you can do it using bytes->path-element which allows you to specify the
path-convention (windows here):
(build-path/convention-type 'windows (bytes->path-element (string->bytes/utf-8
I asked a similar question a while ago, and I received a good explanation
of why this is the case (you have to work with bytes instead of strings).
However, the error messages reported by the path functions are indeed
confusing and could be improved:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin
And here I was hoping for the piece to somehow have a Rackety end...
On 08/01/2019 22:09, Tim Hanson wrote:
> great piece by Michelle Goldberg, imho:
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/07/opinion/rashida-tlaib-profanity.html
>
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you are subs
21 matches
Mail list logo
