A,
ok thank you very much. By the way, when I make a tab-panel with multiple tabs
and add a list-box to the tab-panel it appears on all tab pages. So how can I
specify the tab/tabindex as parent to the list-box?
And is it possible to init the list-box with more choices as one. In the
example
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:59 AM, wrote:
> A,
> ok thank you very much. By the way, when I make a tab-panel with multiple
> tabs and add a list-box to the tab-panel it appears on all tab pages. So
> how can I specify the tab/tabindex as parent to the list-box?
>
You need to change the childr
>What about?
>
>"People hang on his every line; but usually he needs just one."
>"He can write Lisp programs, in C."
>"He once had a seg fault, just to see how it feels."
>
>Stuff like that seems pretty easy to come up with.
It's fun - you should try it.
"He could disarm you with his macro expan
Thank you all for your feedback.
FWIW three of the eight student authors are girls,
and all of them participated in every step of the
creation of the video, from the very inception, the
story writing, and the production process. None of
them had any objections; to the contrary, they found
it
I'm still getting the crash using the first method on:
DrRacket version 5.3.1.10--2012-12-20(8d5a069/a) [3m]
On 19 December 2012 13:12, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think the problem was a memory-management issue in the JPEG binding,
> since the crash I provoked was in libjpeg.
>
> After fixing tha
I'm trying to replace a function with another using parameterize.
For example, when I try:
(define (add2 n)
(add1 (add1 n)))
(parameterize ([add1 (λ [n] (+ n 2))])
(add2 2))
I get an error:
parameterize: contract violation
expected: parameter?
received: #
How do I re-bind functions i
On 12/21/12 9:41 PM, Cristian Esquivias wrote:
I'm trying to replace a function with another using parameterize.
For example, when I try:
(define (add2 n)
(add1 (add1 n)))
(parameterize ([add1 (λ [n] (+ n 2))])
(add2 2))
I get an error:
parameterize: contract violation
expected: p
After thinking about this for a while, not particularly liking any of the
other suggestions and failing to come up with better ones myself, I've just
pushed something so the arrows can be disabled (without disabling all of
the background expansion features) as requested by Tobias. At least that
way
Cool, thanks Robby.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> After thinking about this for a while, not particularly liking any of the
> other suggestions and failing to come up with better ones myself, I've just
> pushed something so the arrows can be disabled (without disabling
9 matches
Mail list logo
