Hi Vince,
Thank you for your work on this.
Have you looked into Jay McCarthy's Chipmunk package on Planet?
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/jaymccarthy/chipmunk.plt/1/0/
Best,
Gabor
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Thanks! Regarding the interaction-eval example, is there any way of
wrapping this up in a macro so it doesn't have to be repeated for each use
of examples in the file? I know that it's possible to get the module name
via the 'enclosing-module-name syntax property, but I've got no idea how to
rewrit
Yeah I did. It looks like the bindings are a couple of years old now
with no maintenance. I actually have them downloaded and am using them
as reference, or copy pasting some things here and there when I'm not
sure exactly what to do or just wanting to leverage the typing he has
already done. I'm
Hi all,
I want to write a simple blog with racket, is there any marddown
library?
--
aisk
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Thx for reply, but i'm working on a simple small dynamic blog website, not
generate static pages.
2012/6/8 Matthias Felleisen
>
> Is this helpful:
>
>
> http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/ryanc/scriblogify.plt/1/0/planet-docs/scriblogify/index.html
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, 安龙
On 06/06/2012 03:21 PM, Anurag Mendhekar wrote:
I'm considering writing an H.264 encoder/decoder in Racket. Has anyone
tried such a thing before?
Codecs require a lot of bit-whacking and the h264 standard is
particularly convoluted. Efficiencies are obtained in C in many
different and usually c
Why not use bytes?
Also, if the algorithms are parallel, you might consider using futures.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 03:21 PM, Anurag Mendhekar wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm considering writing an H.264 encoder/decoder in Racket. Has anyone
>> tried such a
On 06/07/2012 04:29 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Why not use bytes?
Even if you try to just use bytes, you end up using fixnums:
> (fixnum? (bytes-ref (bytes 0 1 2 3) 3))
#t
What I mean is there's no way to operate on a data type that's exactly 8
bits wide. (Unless you can use the FFI for that,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>> Also, if the algorithms are parallel, you might consider using futures.
>
>
> Good idea. I wonder if anyone has investigated whether it's significantly
> easier to use futures effectively in Typed Racket. Its optimizations are
> designed to av
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 06/07/2012 01:14 AM:
That was toy example of a call to "progedit", like a test case, and
not very clear. In a real program, you'd programmatically build the
list you pass to the "#:insert" keyword argument of "progedit". So,
you would only add the (0 "#lang setup/infota
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
> James is working on a visualizer that will help understand the
> peculiarities of futures and I hope it'll be in a pushable state in
> not too long.
For correct programs, the visualizer will allow one to say
"I have seen your futures, and they work!"
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>>> Also, if the algorithms are parallel, you might consider using futures.
>>
>>
>> Good idea. I wonder if anyone has investigated whether it's significantly
>> easier to use futures effect
Hello everyone,
I am writing a small experiment in which I want to persist a continuation
in an SQLite database.
It wasn't possible to 'insert' the continuation directly, so I tried using
"serialize" (from racket/serialize) but it turned out that continuations
are not serializable.
My program is
If you write in
#lang web-server/base
then you will get serialization continuations, but none of the Web
libraries. The transformation isn't really Web-specific.
Jay
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am writing a small experiment in which I want to
Jay,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> If you write in
>
> #lang web-server/base
>
> then you will get serialization continuations, but none of the Web
> libraries. The transformation isn't really Web-specific.
>
>
I could not use #lang web-server/base on Racket v5.2.1 (Win
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> Jay,
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>>
>> If you write in
>>
>> #lang web-server/base
>>
>> then you will get serialization continuations, but none of the Web
>> libraries. The transformation isn't really Web-spec
16 matches
Mail list logo
