(And you also want to catch all exns at that points and put them into ch. But I
suspect you’d have known.)
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> I would do something like:
>
> (define ch (make-channel))
> (submit-job! jq (lambda () (define ans ...) (channel-put ch ans)))
> (c
I would do something like:
(define ch (make-channel))
(submit-job! jq (lambda () (define ans ...) (channel-put ch ans)))
(channel-get ch ans)
This will synchronously wait for the job to finish. Presumably you'd
do this when you already started up the workers and from a context
where you have a lo
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code
> assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should
> protect itself from job exceptions.
>
BTW, how would you recommend returning a va
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 1:49:04 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I just pushed a fix for this, btw.
>
>
Awesome, thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i
I just pushed a fix for this, btw.
Jay
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Dan Liebgold
wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> > The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code
> > assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code
> assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should
> protect itself from job exceptions.
>
Probably a good idea. I got confused workin
The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code
assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should
protect itself from job exceptions.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Dan Liebgold
wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:30:08 PM UTC-8, David K. Storrs wro
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:30:08 PM UTC-8, David K. Storrs wrote:
>
> Can you simply catch it and handle it inside the thunk?
>
That's probably best. I was looking at the machinery to serialize exceptions in
type racket* and thinking I needed that
*:
https://github.com/racket/ty
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Dan Liebgold
wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 3:32:48 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> > Wow, that's a lame error that has been there for a LONG time. I just
> > pushed a fix.
> >
>
> Got it.
>
> Any advice for how to handle when a job thunk raises an exce
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 3:32:48 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Wow, that's a lame error that has been there for a LONG time. I just
> pushed a fix.
>
Got it.
Any advice for how to handle when a job thunk raises an exception? Currently
(stop-job-queue! jq) waits forever...
--
You re
Wow, that's a lame error that has been there for a LONG time. I just
pushed a fix.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Dan Liebgold
wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:23:32 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> DrDr uses job-queue for a similar process
>>
>> http://docs.racket-lang.org/job-queu
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:23:32 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> DrDr uses job-queue for a similar process
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/job-queue/index.html
>
Looks promising. However, the docs say that stop-job-queue! will block until
jobs are done... and this code doesn't wait: ht
Typed Racket uses this code:
https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/blob/master/typed-racket-test/send-places.rkt
to manage a job queue for testing.
Sam
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> DrDr uses job-queue for a similar process
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/job-queue/inde
DrDr uses job-queue for a similar process
http://docs.racket-lang.org/job-queue/index.html
Jay
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Dan Liebgold
wrote:
> I find myself implementing make (or something similar) in Racket... can
> anyone point to a good example of the job server portion? Specifical
14 matches
Mail list logo
