I think if there is a direction to go in, it's to make a SSH-friendly and
truly extensible text version of DrRacket. I would use this all day; I
only really use vim because it's terminal friendly and the editing is
great.
DrRacket offers a lot in terms of integration with Racket facilities and
Am I correct in understanding that you are unfamiliar with rebasing? If so I
would gladly pair with you on it. I do it all the time at work.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help folks!
>
> I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I d
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:38:26PM -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being git, there are probably a variety of ways to go about this. What
I might try (but haven't verified first-hand):
One-time setup:
- On master, `git pull --ff-only upstream`.
- On master, create from master a new branch named "
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:38:26PM -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being git, there are probably a variety of ways to go about this. What
I might try (but haven't verified first-hand):
One-time setup:
- On master, `git pull --ff-only upstream`.
- On master, create from master a new branch named "
Once upon a time I forked a repo, committed against master, and
couldn't figure out how to "re-sync" with upstream. I resorted to
deleting the fork and starting over. I wanted a sure-fire recipe to
avoid that.
Although I know a bit more about git now, I still follow that recipe.
So far when I've
> On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help folks!
>
> I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I do anything.
> It sounds like something my mother would have advised against.
>
> On 03/07/15 03:52, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:53 PM, John
Thanks for the help folks!
I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I do anything.
It sounds like something my mother would have advised against.
On 03/07/15 03:52, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:53 PM, John Clements wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Alexander D. Knauth
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:53 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Alexander D. Knauth
>>> wrote:
>
>>> After you resolve them you will (I think) need to `git add` the files that
>>> you resolved conflicts
On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:53 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>> After you resolve them you will (I think) need to `git add` the files that
>> you resolved conflicts for, then
>> `git rebase --continue`, and then when the rebase is finished, `gi
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I have two pull requests related to my separation of "net/url-string"
>> from "net/url".
>>
>> plt/racket #948 implementation of the separation
>> racket/net #4
On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have two pull requests related to my separation of "net/url-string"
> from "net/url".
>
> plt/racket #948 implementation of the separation
> racket/net #4test and documentation of the above
>
> My problem is that I have been wor
11 matches
Mail list logo
