Re: [racket-users] documentation files in new package system

2015-09-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:53:59 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Is it OK if I *exclude* the HTML rendering of the docs from the files > included in the packaging altogether (which would give me the below > files)? That sounds right to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [racket-users] documentation files in new package system

2015-09-17 Thread Neil Van Dyke
OK, instead of "doc.scrbl", I'll have ".scrbl". Is it OK if I *exclude* the HTML rendering of the docs from the files included in the packaging altogether (which would give me the below files)? * info.rkt (the usual) * somepackage.rkt (the full implementation with embedded docs, for my packag

Re: [racket-users] documentation files in new package system

2015-09-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
Be sure not to use the name "doc" for the document, but instead a name that is connected to the package (because all documents are rendered to the same place in installation scope). In other words, either make the document source "somepackage.scrbl" or use "somepackage" as the document name in the