Many thanks.
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Sure, with whatever improvements you'd like to make.
>
> At 23 Jan 2018 16:53:15 -0500, "John Clements" wrote:
>> Permission to paste this summary on Stack Exchange?
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Matthew Flatt wr
Sure, with whatever improvements you'd like to make.
At 23 Jan 2018 16:53:15 -0500, "John Clements" wrote:
> Permission to paste this summary on Stack Exchange?
>
>
> > On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > At 23 Jan 2018 15:57:34 -0500, "'John Clements' via Racket Users" w
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:03 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>
>
> Huh? Serves you right for using the top level. It works fine if you place it
> in the definitions window :-)
Of course, and that’s what I told the poster on Stack Exchange. I was befuddled
by the existing behavior, but I exp
Permission to paste this summary on Stack Exchange?
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At 23 Jan 2018 15:57:34 -0500, "'John Clements' via Racket Users" wrote:
>> despite being inside of a binding of the name map
>
> That's the essence of the problem. Which things are in t
At 23 Jan 2018 15:57:34 -0500, "'John Clements' via Racket Users" wrote:
> despite being inside of a binding of the name map
That's the essence of the problem. Which things are in the scope of a
top-level definition?
For example, is the reference to `f` in the scope of a binding of `f`
in
(def
Huh? Serves you right for using the top level. It works fine if you place it in
the definitions window :-)
> Welcome to DrRacket, version 6.11.0.4--2017-12-18(-/f) [3m].
> Language: racket, with debugging; memory limit: 256 MB.
> > (map '() add1)
> '()
> > (map '(1) add1)
> '(2)
> > (map '(1 2)
6 matches
Mail list logo
