aha, here it is!
The closest form is then `(call-with-input-string str (λ(in)(port->list
read in)))'.
Thanks Sam and Alex!
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:01 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> Also, almost that `read-all` function is provided as `port->list` from
> `racket/port`.
>
> Sam
>
> On Wed, Feb
Also, almost that `read-all` function is provided as `port->list` from
`racket/port`.
Sam
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:25 AM Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>
> (read-from-string "123") is equivalent to `(call-with-input-string "123"
> read)` while read-from-string-all can be replaced by:
>
> (define (rea
On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:58:47 PM UTC+8, Laurent Orseau wrote:
>
> Oh nice, I didn't know we could do that one!
> Point taken :)
>
> I suppose (hope?) you can still use sandboxing with memory limits for this?
>
You could make your own read table which disables all special treatment o
Oh nice, I didn't know we could do that one!
Point taken :)
I suppose (hope?) you can still use sandboxing with memory limits for this?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:52 AM Alex Harsanyi
wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:36:40 PM UTC+8, Laurent Orseau wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019
On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:36:40 PM UTC+8, Laurent Orseau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:25 AM Alex Harsanyi > wrote:
>
> although I am not sure it is a good idea to call read on strings received
>> from the user...
>>
>
> They're not eval'ed,
>
>
Try: (call-with-input-string "
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:25 AM Alex Harsanyi
wrote:
> (read-from-string "123") is equivalent to `(call-with-input-string "123"
> read)` while read-from-string-all can be replaced by:
>
> (define (read-all in)
> (let loop ([result '()])
> (let ((v (read in)))
> (if (eo
6 matches
Mail list logo
