On 8/1/2020 3:48 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Note that Matthew's point was not about bytecode, but about the
machine code in the Racket BC executable vs the machine code in the
Chez kernel plus boot files. Especially if you look pre-7.0, there is
very little bytecode in the Racket BC execu
Note that Matthew's point was not about bytecode, but about the machine
code in the Racket BC executable vs the machine code in the Chez kernel
plus boot files. Especially if you look pre-7.0, there is very little
bytecode in the Racket BC executable.
Sam
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 3:46 PM Gustavo Mass
The human friendly version of the bytecode is explained in
https://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/decompile.html?q=decompile#%28mod-path._compiler%2Fdecompile%29
. The human friendly version looks similar to the expanded version of a
program that you get with the Macro Debugger (when the macros are not
Hi Matthew,
On 8/1/2020 2:01 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 01 Aug 2020 03:56:36 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:20:05 -0700 (PDT),
> "wanp...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> >I noticed that the size of the CS version is 244% compare to BS
> >version. Wondering why it became so
At Sat, 01 Aug 2020 03:56:36 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:20:05 -0700 (PDT),
> "wanp...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> >I noticed that the size of the CS version is 244% compare to BS
> >version. Wondering why it became so large. Does that mean Chez Scheme
> >runtime/vm 100 MB
5 matches
Mail list logo
