Re: [racket-users] Re: Getting young children started with Racket

2018-03-05 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
On 04/03/18 13:31, Prabhakar Ragde wrote: > > I used Racket with both my children at age 9. Here is a short writeup > about it originally posted to this mailing list. > > https://web.archive.org/web/20080612194829/http://home.adelphi.edu/sbloch/class/hs/testimonials/prabhakar.shtml > > In answ

Re: [racket-users] Re: Getting young children started with Racket

2018-03-05 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:13:51PM -0500, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > > Mathematics is fascinating. It's repetitive arithmetic practice that's > > completely, totally boring and designed to inculcate hatred of the > > subject. > > “designed” ? That is an overstatement, yes. --

Re: [racket-users] Re: Getting young children started with Racket

2018-03-05 Thread Alexander Shopov
Lets not meander off the question, shall we? For an intro to programming - quickly seeing what and why happens trumps things like S-expressions vs identation, functional vs imperative, name it. What matters is that kids can form some mental model of what is happening and why. Thus feedback matters

Re: [racket-users] Re: Getting young children started with Racket

2018-03-05 Thread 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> Mathematics is fascinating. It's repetitive arithmetic practice that's > completely, totally boring and designed to inculcate hatred of the > subject. “designed” ? John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [racket-users] Re: Getting young children started with Racket

2018-03-05 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:47:13AM -0800, HiPhish wrote: > > As for Racket, I'm not quite sure. I think the S-expression syntax, > immutability and functional programming are a bit harder to wrap your mind > around than the usual way of giving the computer a sequence of instructions > to > follow